Developments in the Cretaceous Stratigraphy of Crimea. Part 2. Upper Cretaceous and Conclusions

E. Yu. Baraboshkin,A. Yu. Guzhikov,I. P. Ryabov,E. M. Tesakova,V. S. Vishnevskaya,M. A. Ustinova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s0869593824700217
2024-11-21
Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation
Abstract:This is the second part of the paper on the Cretaceous of the Mountainous Crimea. A lot of new data has been received during last ten years. This paper summarizes the state of knowledge of the Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy, selected biostratigraphic groups (ammonites, belemnites, ostracods, foraminifers, gilianelles, nannoplankton) and magnetostratigraphy. Ammonite and belemnite biostratigraphic subdivisions are proposed for the first time for the Crimean Upper Cretaceous. Foraminifera-based biostratigraphy is updated, and new biostratigraphic units are proposed and correlated with the European scale. Stratigraphic hiatuses are recognised in the succession of southwestern Crimea: the base and the top of lower Cenomanian, upper Coniacian–lower Santonian, Campanian/Maastrichtian and Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary intervals.
geology,paleontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?