Compromise in multilateral negotiations and the global regulation of artificial intelligence

Michal Natorski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2351583
2024-06-07
Democratization
Abstract:As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies spread worldwide, international discussions have increasingly focused on their consequences for democracy, human rights, fundamental freedoms, security, and economic and social development. In this context, UNESCO's Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, adopted in November 2021, has emerged as the first global normative framework for AI development and deployment. The intense negotiations of every detail of the document brought forth numerous controversies among UNESCO member states. Drawing on a unique set of primary sources, including written positions and recorded deliberations, this article explains the achievement of global compromise on AI regulation despite the multiplicity of UNESCO member-state positions representing a variety of liberal and sovereignist preferences. Building upon Boltanski's pragmatic sociology, it conceptualizes the practice of multilateral negotiations and attributes the multilateral fragile agreements to two embedded therein compromises: Structural normative hybridity and situated normative ambiguity allowed to accomplish a compromise by linking macro-normative structures with situated debates of multilateral negotiations.
political science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper primarily explores how to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) on a global scale in multilateral negotiations and explains how UNESCO member states reached compromises under various normative positions. #### Core Issues of the Paper: 1. **Global AI Regulation**: With the widespread application of AI technology globally, the international community is increasingly concerned about its impact on democracy, human rights, fundamental freedoms, security, and economic and social development. Therefore, how to formulate an effective global AI regulatory framework has become an urgent issue. 2. **Compromise in Multilateral Negotiations**: The paper analyzes the multilateral negotiation process among UNESCO member states, explaining how different countries found common ground between their respective normative preferences (such as liberalism and sovereigntism) to reach a global AI ethics recommendation. #### Specific Research Content: - **Background Introduction**: In November 2021, UNESCO adopted the "Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence," the first global normative framework for AI. During this process, there were many disputes and differences among member states. - **Theoretical Framework**: The paper employs Luc Boltanski's practice theory to analyze normative compromises in multilateral negotiations. Specifically, it distinguishes between two types of compromises: structural normative hybridity and situated normative ambiguity. - **Empirical Analysis**: Through the coding analysis of various documents and audio materials from the negotiation process, the paper details the specific mechanisms for achieving normative compromises in multilateral negotiations. Through these analyses, the paper aims to reveal how consensus is reached under different normative positions in multilateral negotiations and to provide theoretical and practical references for future global governance.