Association of Extended Dosing Intervals or Delays in Pembrolizumab-based Regimens With Survival Outcomes in Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Kartik Sehgal,Anushi Bulumulle,Heather Brody,Ritu R Gill,Shravanti Macherla,Aleksandra Qilleri,Danielle C McDonald,Cynthia R Cherry,Meghan Shea,Mark S Huberman,Paul A VanderLaan,Glen J Weiss,Paul R Walker,Daniel B Costa,Deepa Rangachari,Ritu R. Gill,Danielle C. McDonald,Cynthia R. Cherry,Mark S. Huberman,Paul A. VanderLaan,Glen J. Weiss,Paul R. Walker,Daniel B. Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.028
IF: 4.84
2021-05-01
Clinical Lung Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Besides modeling/simulation-based analysis, no post-approval studies have evaluated optimal administration frequency of pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Patients and Methods</h3><p>We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate association between survival outcomes and treatment extensions/delays of pembrolizumab-based regimens in advanced NSCLC patients. Those who had received at least four cycles in routine practice were divided into two groups: non-standard (Non-Std: ≥2 cycles at intervals &gt;3weeks +3days) and standard (Std: all cycles every 3weeks or 1 cycle &gt;3weeks +3days).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Among 150 patients, 92 (61%) were eligible for the study (Non-Std:27, Std:65). Reasons for patients with extensions/delays in the Non-Std group included: immune-related adverse events (irAEs,33%), non-irAE-related medical issues (26%), and patient-physician preference (41%). Non-Std group was more likely to have higher PD-L1 tumor proportion score, higher number of treatment cycles and pembrolizumab monotherapy. Univariate and 6-month landmark analyses showed longer median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in Non-Std group compared to the Std group. After multivariable adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant difference in OS [HR 1.2 (95%C.I.: 0.3–4.8), p=0.824] or PFS [HR 2.6 (95%C.I.: 0.7–9.6), p=0.157] between the two groups.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study shows that a significant proportion of advanced NSCLC patients receive pembrolizumab-based regimens with extended intervals or delays in routine clinical practice and with similar outcomes to those receiving treatment at label-specified 3-week intervals. Given the durability of benefit seen and the potential for cost reduction and decreased infusion frequency in these patients, this requires validation in prospective trials.</p>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?