Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

Improving somatic exome sequencing performance by biological replicates

Toward best practice in cancer mutation detection with whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing

De Novo Identification of Expressed Cancer Somatic Mutations from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

DeepSomatic: Accurate somatic small variant discovery for multiple sequencing technologies

Whole Genome and Exome Sequencing Reference Datasets from a Multi-Center and Cross-Platform Benchmark Study

Abstract 2338: Benchmarking long- and short-read somatic structural variation callers using a multi-technology panel of six tumor/normal cell lines

Evaluation of somatic copy number variation detection by NGS technologies and bioinformatics tools on a hyper-diploid cancer genome

Somatic Point Mutation Calling in Low Cellularity Tumors

Towards an Accurate and Robust Analysis Pipeline for Somatic Mutation Calling

Comprehensive identification of somatic nucleotide variants in human brain tissue

Challenges in Detecting Somatic Recombination of Repeat Elements: Insights from Short and Long Read Datasets

Accelerated somatic mutation calling for whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data from heterogenous tumor samples

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

Severus: accurate detection and characterization of somatic structural variation in tumor genomes using long reads

Abstract P19: Comprehensive Benchmark of Somatic Mutation Callers on Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Data in Cancer Liquid Biopsy

DNA copy number analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed specimens by shallow whole-genome sequencing with identification and exclusion of problematic regions in the genome assembly

Analyzing somatic mutations by single-cell whole-genome sequencing

Detecting Somatic Mutations Without Matched Normal Samples Using Long Reads

A robust benchmark for detecting low-frequency variants in the HG002 Genome In A Bottle NIST reference material.

Assessing reproducibility of inherited variants detected with short-read whole genome sequencing

Comprehensive Assessment of Somatic Copy Number Variation Calling Using Next-Generation Sequencing Data