Abstract:In this article, we investigate the applicability of quantum machine learning for classification tasks using two quantum classifiers from the Qiskit Python environment: the variational quantum circuit and the quantum kernel estimator (QKE). We provide a first evaluation on the performance of these classifiers when using a hyperparameter search on six widely known and publicly available benchmark datasets and analyze how their performance varies with the number of samples on two artificially generated test classification datasets. As quantum machine learning is based on unitary transformations, this paper explores data structures and application fields that could be particularly suitable for quantum advantages. Hereby, this paper introduces a novel dataset based on concepts from quantum mechanics using the exponential map of a Lie algebra. This dataset will be made publicly available and contributes a novel contribution to the empirical evaluation of quantum supremacy. We further compared the performance of VQC and QKE on six widely applicable datasets to contextualize our results. Our results demonstrate that the VQC and QKE perform better than basic machine learning algorithms, such as advanced linear regression models (Ridge and Lasso). They do not match the accuracy and runtime performance of sophisticated modern boosting classifiers such as XGBoost, LightGBM, or CatBoost. Therefore, we conclude that while quantum machine learning algorithms have the potential to surpass classical machine learning methods in the future, especially when physical quantum infrastructure becomes widely available, they currently lag behind classical approaches. Our investigations also show that classical machine learning approaches have superior performance classifying datasets based on group structures, compared to quantum approaches that particularly use unitary processes. Furthermore, our findings highlight the significant impact of different quantum simulators, feature maps, and quantum circuits on the performance of the employed quantum estimators. This observation emphasizes the need for researchers to provide detailed explanations of their hyperparameter choices for quantum machine learning algorithms, as this aspect is currently overlooked in many studies within the field. To facilitate further research in this area and ensure the transparency of our study, we have made the complete code available in a linked GitHub repository.

Universal Approximation Property of Quantum Machine Learning Models in Quantum-Enhanced Feature Spaces

Quantum kernels with Gaussian state encoding for machine learning

Bayesian machine learning for Boltzmann machine in quantum-enhanced feature spaces

Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces

Feature Map for Quantum Data in Classification

Quantum Neural Networks As Universal Function Approximators: Theory and Implementation

Non-Unitary Quantum Machine Learning

Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces

Quantum classifiers with a trainable kernel

On the Applicability of Quantum Machine Learning

Universal Approximation Theorem and error bounds for quantum neural networks and quantum reservoirs

QEML (Quantum Enhanced Machine Learning): Using Quantum Computing to Enhance ML Classifiers and Feature Spaces

Trainable Discrete Feature Embeddings for Variational Quantum Classifier

Learning Unitary Transformation by Quantum Machine Learning Model

Parametrized Quantum Circuits and their approximation capacities in the context of quantum machine learning

Quantum Circuits, Feature Maps, and Expanded Pseudo-Entropy: A Categorical Theoretic Analysis of Encoding Real-World Data into a Quantum Computer

Quantum machine learning for multiclass classification beyond kernel methods

Universal expressiveness of variational quantum classifiers and quantum kernels for support vector machines

Leveraging Data Locality in Quantum Convolutional Classifiers

Quantum Visual Feature Encoding Revisited

Quantum kernels with squeezed-state encoding for machine learning