Abstract:Abstract Background Postoperative epidural haematoma and wound infection can cause devastating neurological damage in spinal surgery. Closed drainage is a common method to prevent epidural haematoma, infection and related neurological impairment after lumbar decompression; however, it is not clear whether drainage can reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical efficacy. This randomized study aims to explore the role of closed drainage in reducing postoperative complications and improving the clinical efficacy of single-level lumbar discectomy. Methods A total of 420 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation were finally included in this study (169 females and 251 males, age 50.0 ± 6.4 years). A total of 214 patients were randomly assigned to the closed drainage group, and 206 patients were assigned to the non-drainage group. The incidence of postoperative fever, symptomatic epidural haematoma, wound infection and the need for revision surgery were compared between the two groups by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the improvement of pain relief and the recovery of lumbar function. The VAS and ODI scores were compared between the two groups using t tests. Results The complications of the two groups were compared and analysed. There was only a statistically significant difference in the postoperative fever rate ( p = 0.022), as the non-drainage group had a higher fever rate, but there were no significant differences in the rates of symptomatic epidural haematoma, wound infection or revision operation ( p > 0.05). After concrete analysis, for the rate of fever less than 38.5 degrees, there was a statistically significant difference ( p = 0.027), but there was no significant difference when the fever was greater than 38.5 degrees ( p > 0.05). When comparing the VAS scores of the operation area on the first day after the operation, the pain relief in the closed drainage group was significantly better than that in the non-drainage group, with scores of 5.1 ± 0.8 and 6.0 ± 0.7, respectively ( p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the other VAS scores of operation areas, the VAS scores of the lower extremity, or the ODI scores ( p > 0.05). Conclusions For single-level lumbar discectomy, closed drainage is beneficial for reducing postoperative low-grade fever and relieving pain in the operation area in the very early postoperative stage. However, drainage does not have a significant impact on reducing the incidence of postoperative complications or improving clinical efficacy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR1800016005 , May/06/2018, retrospectively registered.

The safety of perioperative antiplatelet continuation without selection biases in microsurgical decompression surgery for single level lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniotomy

Safety and Clinical Results of Continuous Low-Dose Aspirin in Microendoscopic Laminectomy

Non-instrumented extradural lumbar spine surgery under low-dose acetylsalicylic acid: a comparative risk analysis study

Antithrombotic therapy and spinal surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 289 consecutive elderly patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis

The safe and risk assessment of perioperative antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy in inguinal hernia repair, a systematic review

Continuation Versus Discontinuation of Aspirin-Based Antiplatelet Therapy for Perioperative Bleeding and Ischaemic Events in Adults Undergoing Neurosurgery: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients undergoing lumbar discectomy: a retrospective study on 163 patients

Continuing Anti-thrombotic Medication During Low-to-Intermediate Risk Spinal Procedures: A Retrospective Evaluation

Short-term effectiveness of precise safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective cohort study

Short-term effectiveness of safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective cohort study

Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis

Surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Multilevel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: Clinical Efficacy and Durability to 2 Years

177. Whether intraoperative hydrogen peroxide irrigation reduces blood loss and surgical site infection after multilevel posterior lumbar surgery: a prospective case-control study of 2,400 patients

The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study

Aspirin Monotherapy vs No Antiplatelet Therapy in Stable Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Low-to-Intermediate Risk Noncardiac Surgery

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (RCT) ON PREOPERATIVE CESSATION VS NO PREOPERATIVE CESSATION OF ASPIRIN IN LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Closed drainage versus non-drainage for single-level lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Perioperative Use of Anticoagulant and Platelet-inhibiting Medications for Elective Spine Surgery: Results of a Nationwide Survey

A retrospective study of the mid-term efficacy of full-endoscopic annulus fibrosus suture following lumbar discectomy

Efficacy and Safety of Full-endoscopic Decompression via Interlaminar Approach for Central or Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: A Meta-analysis