Prenatal and early-life exposures alter expression of innate immunity genes: the PASTURE cohort study.

G. Loss,S. Bitter,Johanna Wohlgensinger,R. Frei,C. Roduit,J. Genuneit,J. Pekkanen,M. Roponen,M. Hirvonen,J. Dalphin,M. Dalphin,J. Riedler,E. von Mutius,J. Weber,M. Kabesch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.049

IF: 14.29

2012-08-01

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Incorporating Game Theory Into Voluntary Vaccination

Xinyu Wang,Peican Zhu,Zhen Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/cyber.2018.8688199

2018-01-01

Abstract:Aiming to achieve widespread immunity to infectious diseases, voluntary vaccination becomes a challenge for people because of the existence of the temptation of free-ride which brings the vaccination coverage below the social optimum. In this manuscript, we integrate a game-theoretic framework into the SIR epidemiological process, while we also try to investigate the effects of varying different factors on the voluntary vaccination coverage. In our model, individuals are assumed to possess adequate information about their circumstance and then they are able to estimate the costs and benefits of vaccination. To maximize the benefits, various factors are considered, such as the cost of the vaccine, the effectiveness of the vaccine, the likelihood of being infected and etc. In this wok, we mainly focus on studying the effects of varying four parameters. As indicated by the results, the Nash equilibrium can hardly achieve a high level if the vaccination cost is higher than the infectious risk; nevertheless, widespread immunity can be achieved by appropriately adjusting the vaccine price and the risk of infection. Our work sheds light on how benefits affect individuals' choices regarding to vaccination and finally influence the herd immunity coverage in a well-mixed population.
The Vaccinee's Dilemma: Individual-level Decisions, Self- Organization & Influenza Epidemics

Raffaele Vardavas,Romulus Breban,Sally Blower

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.q-bio/0610033

2006-10-17

Populations and Evolution

Abstract:Inspired by Minority Games, we constructed a novel individual-level game of adaptive decision-making based on the dilemma of deciding whether to participate in voluntary influenza vaccination programs. The proportion of the population vaccinated (i.e., the vaccination coverage) determines epidemic severity. Above a critical vaccination coverage, epidemics are prevented; hence individuals find it unnecessary to vaccinate. The adaptive dynamics of the decisions directly affect influenza epidemiology and, conversely, influenza epidemiology strongly influences decision-making. This feedback mechanism creates a unique self-organized state where epidemics are prevented. This state is attracting, but unstable; thus epidemics are rarely prevented. This result implies that vaccination will have to be mandatory if the public health objective is to prevent influenza epidemics. We investigated how collective behavior changes when public health programs are implemented. Surprisingly, programs requiring advance payment for several years of vaccination prevents severe epidemics, even with voluntary vaccination. Prevention is determined by the individuals' adaptability, memory, and number of pre-paid vaccinations. Notably, vaccinating families exacerbates and increases the frequency of severe epidemics.
Individual decisions to vaccinate one's child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives

Frederik Verelst,Lander Willem,Roselinde Kessels,Philippe Beutels

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.038

Abstract:It is essential for public health to understand what drives people's hesitance towards vaccination. Theoretical models of vaccination decisions are ubiquitous, often incorporating herd immunity, perceptions of vaccine-related side-effects (VRSE) and of vaccine-preventable burden of disease, but with little to no empirical exploration. Herd immunity is a (usually) positive externality where vaccinated individuals influence others' risks by their reduced capability to transmit an infectious disease to them. It is often assumed that (rational) individuals incorporate this externality in their strategic vaccination decision, from which free-riding behavior arises. We performed a Bayesian D-efficient discrete choice experiment in February-March 2017 to study vaccination behavior in 1919 Belgian respondents. Choice sets with vaccine profiles were constructed using six attributes: vaccine effectiveness, VRSE, accessibility (in terms of convenience and reimbursement), vaccine-preventable burden of disease, local (respondents' network of contacts) vaccination coverage, and population (the population at large) vaccination coverage. VRSE and accessibility are the most influential attributes, followed by vaccine effectiveness and burden of disease. Both population and local coverage are less important than the other attributes, but show a significant direct linear relationship with vaccine utility. This supports the existence of peer influence (more incentivized as more and more vaccinate), rather than free-riding on herd immunity. These findings were independent of whether respondents made vaccine choices for themselves or for their child. Around 40% of the respondents indicated accepting vaccination with little or no questioning. These 'acceptors' were less sensitive to changes in the vaccine-preventable burden of disease for their child's vaccination choices (but not for themselves). Public health institutions are critical in stimulating vaccine uptake by making vaccines conveniently available at an affordable price and by communicating pro-actively on perceived VRSEs. The free-riding assumption as a driver of individual vaccine decisions, seems inappropriate, but this observation needs confirming in other populations.
Rational behavior is a ‘double-edged sword’ when considering voluntary vaccination

Haifeng Zhang,Feng Fu,Wenyao Zhang,Binghong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.05.009

2012-01-01

Abstract:Of particular importance for public health is how to understand strategic vaccination behavior in social networks. Social learning is a central aspect of human behavior, and it thus shapes vaccination individuals’ decision-making. Here, we study two simple models to address the impact of the more rational decision-making of individuals on voluntary vaccination. In the first model, individuals are endowed with memory capacity for their past experiences of dealing with vaccination. In addition to their current payoffs, they also take account of the historical payoffs that are discounted by a memory-decaying factor. They use such overall payoffs (weighing the current payoffs and historical payoffs) to reassess their vaccination strategies. Those who have higher overall payoffs are more likely imitated by their social neighbors. In the second model, individuals do not blindly learn the strategies of neighbors; they also combine the fraction of infection in the past epidemic season. If the fraction of infection surpasses the perceived risk threshold, individuals will increase the probability of taking vaccination. Otherwise, they will decrease the probability of taking vaccination. Then we use evolutionary game theory to study the vaccination behavior of people during an epidemiological process. To do this, we propose a two-stage model: individuals make vaccination decisions during a yearly vaccination campaign, followed by an epidemic season. This forms a feedback loop between the vaccination decisions of individuals and their health outcomes, and thus payoffs. We find that the two more rational decision-making models have nontrivial impacts on the vaccination behavior of individuals, and, as a result, on the final fraction of infection. Our results highlight that, from an individual’s viewpoint, the decisions are optimal and more rational. However, from the social viewpoint, the strategies of individuals can give rise to distinct outcomes. Namely, the rational behavior of individuals plays a ‘double-edged-sword’ role on the social effects.
Imperfect Vaccination Evolutionary Game Incorporating Individual Social Difference and Subjective Perception

Cong Li,Jin-Ying Dai,Xiang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2023.3271894

2023-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems

Abstract:Previous studies have focused on the assumption that individual attitudes toward epidemics, epidemic-related information, and vaccination are identical with much less effort attempting to consider psychological factors and individual heterogeneity. In this article, we employ a two-layer susceptible–infected–recovered–vaccinated/unaware–aware–unaware (SIRV-UAU) coupled network to depict the interplay between epidemic spreading and information diffusion. We propose an imperfect vaccination evolutionary game model integrating prospect theory (PT) to explore the effect of individual subjective perception and social difference on epidemic spreading and vaccination equilibrium. We find that the individual social difference in the epidemic spreading layer has a more significant impact on the epidemic threshold than that in the information diffusion layer. Individual psychological perception and vaccination behavior decision-making determine the vaccination equilibrium: under the PT, vaccination equilibrium increases with the decrease of the rationality coefficient when the vaccination cost is small. Furthermore, we analyze the effect of social differences on individual vaccination behavior decision-making and find that vaccination equilibrium increases with the increase of social reinforcement strength and primary protective probability. Finally, we discuss the effect of infection cost on vaccination equilibrium when the infection cost of vaccinated individuals is less than that of unvaccinated individuals and observe that a small infection cost helps improve the vaccination equilibrium.
Vaccination Dilemma in the thermodynamic limit

Colin Benjamin,Arjun Krishnan U M

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0137393

2023-02-23

Abstract:The vaccination game is a social dilemma that refers to the conundrum individuals face (to get immunized or not) when the population is exposed to an infectious disease. The model has recently gained much traction due to the COVID-19 pandemic since the public perception of vaccines plays a significant role in disease dynamics. This paper studies the vaccination game in the thermodynamic limit with an analytical method derived from the 1D Ising model called Nash equilibrium mapping. The individual dilemma regarding Vaccination comes from an internal conflict wherein one tries to balance the perceived advantages of immunizing with the apparent risks associated with Vaccination which they hear through different news media. We compare the results of Nash equilibrium(NE) mapping to other 1D Ising-based models, namely Darwinian evolution and agent-based simulation. This study aims to analyze the behaviour of an infinite population regarding what fraction of people choose to vaccinate or not vaccinate. While Nash equilibrium mapping and agent-based simulation agree mostly, Darwinian evolution strays far from the two models. It fails to predict the equilibrium behaviour of players in the population reasonably. We apply the results of our study to analyze the Astra-Zeneca(AZ) COVID-19 vaccine risk versus disease deaths debate, both via NE mapping and agent-based method. Both predict near 100% AZ vaccine coverage for people above 40, notwithstanding the risk. At the same time, younger people show a slight reluctance. We predict that while government intervention via vaccination mandates and advertisement campaigns is unnecessary for the older population, for the younger population (ages: 20-39), some encouragement from the government via media campaigns and vaccine mandates may be necessary.

Physics and Society,Statistical Mechanics,Populations and Evolution
Voluntary vaccination dilemma with evolving psychological perceptions.

Xue Feng,Bin Wu,Long Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.11.011

IF: 2.405

2017-01-01

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract:Voluntary vaccination is a universal control protocol for infectious diseases. Yet there exists a social dilemma between individual benefits and public health: non-vaccinators free ride via the herd immunity from adequate vaccinators who bear vaccination cost. This is due to the interplay between disease prevalence and individual vaccinating behavior. To complicate matters further, individual vaccinating behavior depends on the perceived vaccination cost rather than the actual one. The perception of vaccination cost is an individual trait, which varies from person to person, and evolves in response to the disease prevalence and vaccination coverage. To explore how evolving perception shapes individual vaccinating behavior and thus the vaccination dynamics, we provide a model combining epidemic dynamics with evolutionary game theory which captures the voluntary vaccination dilemma. In particular, individuals adjust their perception based on the inertia effect in psychology and then update their vaccinating behavior through imitating the behavior of a more successful peer. We find that i) vaccination is acceptable when the expected vaccination cost considering perception and actual vaccination cost is less than the maximum of the expected non-vaccination cost; ii) the evolution of perception is a "double-edged sword" for vaccination dynamics: it can improve vaccination coverage when most individuals perceive exaggerated vaccination cost, and it inhibits vaccination coverage in the other cases.
Simple economics of vaccination: public policies and incentives

Jesús Villota-Miranda,R Rodríguez-Ibeas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-024-09367-2

Abstract:This paper focuses on the economics of vaccination and, more specifically, analyzes the vaccination decision of individuals using a game-theoretic model combined with an epidemiological SIR model that reproduces the infection dynamics of a generic disease. We characterize the equilibrium individual vaccination rate, and we show that it is below the rate compatible with herd immunity due to the existence of externalities that individuals do not internalize when they decide on vaccination. In addition, we analyze three public policies consisting of informational campaigns to reduce the disutility of vaccination, monetary payments to vaccinated individuals and measures to increase the disutility of non-vaccination. If the public authority uses only one type of policy, herd immunity is not necessarily achieved unless monetary incentives are used. When the public authority is not limited to use only one policy, we find that the optimal public policy should consist only of informational campaigns if they are sufficiently effective, or a combination of informational campaigns and monetary incentives otherwise. Surprisingly, the requirement of vaccine passports or other restrictions on the non-vaccinated are not desirable.
Optimal vaccination: Various (counter) intuitive examples

Jean-François Delmas,Dylan Dronnier,Pierre-André Zitt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.08756

2021-12-16

Abstract:In previous articles, we formalized the problem of optimal allocation strategies for a (perfect) vaccine in an infinite-dimensional metapopulation model. The aim of the current paper is to illustrate this theoretical framework with multiple examples where one can derive the analytic expression of the optimal strategies. We discuss in particular the following points: whether or not it is possible to vaccinate optimally when the vaccine doses are given one at a time (greedy vaccination strategies); the effect of assortativity (that is, the tendency to have more contacts with similar individuals) on the shape of optimal vaccination strategies; the particular case where everybody has the same number of neighbors.

Optimization and Control
Inviting free-riders or appealing to prosocial behavior? Game-theoretical reflections on communicating herd immunity in vaccine advocacy.

Cornelia Betsch,Robert Böhm,Lars Korn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031590

2013-01-01

Health Psychology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Vaccination yields a direct effect by reducing infection, but also has the indirect effect of herd immunity: If many individuals are vaccinated, the immune population will protect unvaccinated individuals (social benefit). However, due to a vaccination's costs and risks, individual incentives to free-ride on others' protection also increase with the number of individuals who are already vaccinated (individual benefit). The objective was to assess the consequences of communicating the social and/or individual benefits of herd immunity on vaccination intentions. We assume that if social benefits are salient, vaccination intentions increase (prosocial behavior), whereas salience of individual benefits might decrease vaccination intentions (free-riding).METHODS: In an online-experiment (N = 342) the definition of herd immunity was provided with one sentence summarizing the gist of the message, either making the individual or social benefit salient or both. A control group received no information about herd immunity. As a moderator, we tested the costs of vaccination (effort in obtaining the vaccine). The dependent measure was intention to vaccinate.RESULTS: When a message emphasized individual benefit, vaccination intentions decreased (free-riding). Communication of social benefit reduced free-riding and increased vaccination intentions when costs to vaccinate were low.CONCLUSIONS: Communicating the social benefit of vaccination may prevent free-riding and should thus be explicitly communicated if individual decisions are meant to consider public health benefits. Especially when vaccination is not the individually (but instead collectively) optimal solution, vaccinations should be easily accessible in order to reach high coverage.

psychology, clinical
Flexible imitation suppresses epidemics through better vaccination

Soya Miyoshi,Marko Jusup,Petter Holme

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00105-z

2021-02-14

Journal of Computational Social Science

Abstract:The decision of whether or not to vaccinate is a complex one. It involves the contribution both to a social good—herd immunity—and to one’s own well-being. It is informed by social influence, personal experience, education, and mass media. In our work, we investigate a situation in which individuals make their choice based on how social neighbourhood responded to previous epidemics. We do this by proposing a minimalistic model using components from game theory, network theory and the modelling of epidemic spreading, and opinion dynamics. Individuals can use the information about the neighbourhood in two ways—either they follow the majority or the best-performing neighbour. Furthermore, we let individuals learn which of these two decision-making strategies to follow from their experience. Our results show that the flexibility of individuals to choose how to integrate information from the neighbourhood increases the vaccine uptake and decreases the epidemic severity if the following conditions are fulfilled. First, the initial fraction of individuals who imitate the neighbourhood majority should be limited, and second, the memory of previous outbreaks should be sufficiently long. These results have implications for the acceptance of novel vaccines and raising awareness about vaccination, while also pointing to promising future research directions.
Stochastic games of parental vaccination decision making and bounded rationality

Andras Balogh,Tamer Oraby

2024-11-08

Abstract:Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent the spread of diseases. However, hesitancy and rejection of vaccines, particularly in childhood immunizations, pose challenges to vaccination efforts. In that case, according to rational decision-making and classical utility theory, parents weigh the costs of vaccinating against the costs of not vaccinating their children. Social norms influence these parental decision-making outcomes, further deviating their decisions from rationality. Additionally, variability in values of utilities stemming from stochasticity in parents' perceptions over time can lead to further deviations from rationality. In this paper, we employ independent white noises to represent stochastic fluctuations in parental perceptions of utility functions of the decisions over time as well as in the disease transmission rates. This approach leads to a system of stochastic differential equations of a susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model coupled with a stochastic replicator equation. We explore the dynamics of these equations and identify new behaviors emerging from stochastic influences. Interestingly, incorporating stochasticity into the utility functions for vaccination and nonvaccination leads to a decision-making model that reflects the bounded rationality of humans. Noise, like social norms, is a two-sided sword that depends on the degree of bounded rationality of each group. We finally perform a stochastic optimal control as a discount to cost of vaccination to counteract bounded rationality.

Probability
Imitation Dynamics of Vaccination Behaviour on Social Networks

Feng Fu,Daniel I. Rosenbloom,Long Wang,Martin A. Nowak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1107

2011-01-01

Abstract:The problem of achieving widespread immunity to infectious diseases by voluntary vaccination is often presented as a public-goods dilemma, as an individual's vaccination contributes to herd immunity, protecting those who forgo vaccination. The temptation to free-ride brings the equilibrium vaccination level below the social optimum. Here, we present an evolutionary game-theoretic approach to this problem, exploring the roles of individual imitation behaviour and population structure in vaccination. To this end, we integrate an epidemiological process into a simple agent-based model of adaptive learning, where individuals use anecdotal evidence to estimate costs and benefits of vaccination. In our simulations, we focus on parameter values that are realistic for a flu-like infection. Paradoxically, as agents become more adept at imitating successful strategies, the equilibrium level of vaccination falls below the rational individual optimum. In structured populations, the picture is only somewhat more optimistic: vaccination is widespread over a range of low vaccination costs, but coverage plummets after cost exceeds a critical threshold. This result suggests parallels to historical scenarios in which vaccination coverage provided herd immunity for some time, but then rapidly dropped. Our work sheds light on how imitation of peers shapes individual vaccination choices in social networks.
Dynamic vaccination game in a heterogeneous mixing population

Liqun Lu,Yanfeng Ouyang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122032

2019-11-01

Abstract:<p>Opposition to vaccination has long been a non-negligible public health phenomenon resulted from people's varied perceptions toward vaccination (e.g., vaccine-phobia). This paper investigates the voluntary vaccination behavior of a heterogeneous population during an epidemic outbreak, where each individual makes its own vaccination decision to minimize its expected disutility from both vaccine-phobia and the risk of infection. Such a problem is known as a vaccination game, as people's vaccination decisions not only affect their own disutilities but those of all others through probabilistic disease transmissions. To study the vaccination game, the susceptible-infected-removed disease propagation process is generalized into a new epidemic dynamics model to allow dynamic vaccination and immunity activation in a heterogeneous mixing population. An efficient computation method is proposed to evaluate the final state of the dynamic epidemic system. Then, a classic game-theoretical equilibrium model is built upon these results to examine the impacts of people's vaccination behavior on the overall risk of epidemic outbreak. A hypothetical case study is used to validate the dynamics model and the derived results, and extensive numerical experiments are conducted to identify the key factors that affect people's vaccination decisions and the risk of an outbreak. Moreover, three alternative vaccination schemes are also studied to examine the effects of early and non-differential vaccination treatments, respectively.</p>
Individual Vaccination as Nash Equilibrium in a SIR Model with Application to the 2009–2010 Influenza A (H1N1) Epidemic in France

Laetitia Laguzet,Gabriel Turinici

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0111-7

2015-10-01

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Abstract:The vaccination against ongoing epidemics is seldom compulsory but remains one of the most classical means to fight epidemic propagation. However, recent debates concerning the innocuity of vaccines and their risk with respect to the risk of the epidemic itself lead to severe vaccination campaign failures, and new mass behaviors appeared driven by individual self-interest. Prompted by this context, we analyze, in a Susceptible–Infected–Recovered model, whether egocentric individuals can reach an equilibrium with the rest of the society. Using techniques from the “Mean Field Games” theory, we extend previous results and show that an equilibrium exists and characterizes completely the individual best vaccination strategy (with or without discounting). We also compare with a strategy based only on overall societal optimization and exhibit a situation with nonnegative price of anarchy. Finally, we apply the theory to the 2009–2010 Influenza A (H1N1) vaccination campaign in France and hint that a group of individuals stopped vaccinating at levels that indicated a pessimistic perception of the risk of the vaccine.

mathematical & computational biology,biology
Individual vaccination as Nash equilibrium in a SIR model with application to the 2009-10 Influenza A(H1N1) epidemic in France

Laetitia Laguzet,Gabriel Turinici

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0111-7

2024-10-05

Abstract:The vaccination against ongoing epidemics is seldom compulsory but remains one of the most classical means to fight epidemic propagation. However recent debates concerning the innocuity of vaccines and their risk with respect to the risk of the epidemic itself lead to severe vaccination campaign failures and new mass behaviors appeared driven by individual self-interest. Prompted by this context we analyze, in a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model, whether egocentric individuals can reach an equilibrium with the rest of the society. Using techniques from the "Mean Field Games" theory, we extend previous results and show that an equilibrium exists and characterizes completely the individual best vaccination strategy (with or without discounting). We also compare with a strategy based only on overall societal optimization and exhibit a situation with non-negative price of anarchy. Finally, we apply the theory to the 2009-2010 Influenza A (H1N1) vaccination campaign in France and hint that a group of individuals stopped vaccinating at levels that indicated a pessimistic perception of the risk of the vaccine.

Populations and Evolution,Optimization and Control
Imperfect Vaccine Aggravates the Long-Standing Dilemma of Voluntary Vaccination

Bin Wu,Feng Fu,Long Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020577

IF: 3.7

2011-01-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Achieving widespread population immunity by voluntary vaccination poses a major challenge for public health administration and practice. The situation is complicated even more by imperfect vaccines. How the vaccine efficacy affects individuals' vaccination behavior has yet to be fully answered. To address this issue, we combine a simple yet effective game theoretic model of vaccination behavior with an epidemiological process. Our analysis shows that, in a population of self-interested individuals, there exists an overshooting of vaccine uptake levels as the effectiveness of vaccination increases. Moreover, when the basic reproductive number, R0, exceeds a certain threshold, all individuals opt for vaccination for an intermediate region of vaccine efficacy. We further show that increasing effectiveness of vaccination always increases the number of effectively vaccinated individuals and therefore attenuates the epidemic strain. The results suggest that 'number is traded for efficiency': although increases in vaccination effectiveness lead to uptake drops due to free-riding effects, the impact of the epidemic can be better mitigated.
Modelling the impact of opinion flexibility on the vaccination choices during epidemics

Della Marca, Rossella,Menale, Marco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-023-00827-4

2024-02-04

Ricerche di Matematica

Abstract:Spontaneous behavioural responses of individuals to epidemics are a relevant factor in the understanding of infection dynamics. In this work, we consider a vaccine–preventable infectious disease spreading within a population, where vaccination is on a voluntary basis and individuals can conform to either the pro–vaccine or the anti–vaccine group. A switch of vaccinating attitude may occur following an imitation game dynamics. In particular, we incorporate the role of individuals' opinion flexibility , that is a measure of the personal propensity to change opinion, in the switch of vaccinating attitude. We consider a disease dynamics of Susceptible–Infected–Removed type. Then, we use the tools of kinetic theory to describe the overall system at microscopic, mesoscopic and macroscopic scale. Finally, the role of flexibility of opinion on the vaccination choice during an epidemic is shown by providing some numerical simulations.

mathematics, applied
Evolutionary dynamics of voluntary vaccination for imperfect multi-efficacy vaccines

Shusheng Hu,Yuan Liu,Bin Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2023.0743

2024-11-17

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract:Voluntary vaccination is crucial for public health. The likelihood that the vaccinated get fully immune is typically referred to as the vaccine efficacy. In addition to this, the efficacy of vaccines also depends on inhibiting the transmission rates and protecting patients from critical symptoms. It has yet to be answered how the multi-efficacy of vaccines affects the vaccination behaviour. Here, we propose a game theoretical model of vaccination behaviour with a heterogeneous-transmission epidemiological process. Intuitively, individuals are likely to take vaccination for either high-efficient vaccines or epidemics with a large basic reproductive number. We find, however, a low economic discount rate can promote the uptake level for low-effectiveness vaccines and epidemics with small basic reproductive numbers. This result suggests that the perceived cost is more important than the risk of infection and the effectiveness of vaccines. In addition, we develop an analytical approximation to address the challenge arising from the coupled dynamics of vaccination and disease spread. This study shows how the interplay among three types of vaccine efficacies (transmission blocking, symptom mitigating and full immunity protecting) affects individual vaccination decisions and epidemic outcomes, and the model can be insightful for epidemic control.

multidisciplinary sciences
Optimal Vaccination Policy to Prevent Endemicity: A Stochastic Model

Félix Foutel-Rodier,Arthur Charpentier,Hélène Guérin

2024-04-05

Abstract:We examine here the effects of recurrent vaccination and waning immunity on the establishment of an endemic equilibrium in a population. An individual-based model that incorporates memory effects for transmission rate during infection and subsequent immunity is introduced, considering stochasticity at the individual level. By letting the population size going to infinity, we derive a set of equations describing the large scale behavior of the epidemic. The analysis of the model's equilibria reveals a criterion for the existence of an endemic equilibrium, which depends on the rate of immunity loss and the distribution of time between booster doses. The outcome of a vaccination policy in this context is influenced by the efficiency of the vaccine in blocking transmissions and the distribution pattern of booster doses within the population. Strategies with evenly spaced booster shots at the individual level prove to be more effective in preventing disease spread compared to irregularly spaced boosters, as longer intervals without vaccination increase susceptibility and facilitate more efficient disease transmission. We provide an expression for the critical fraction of the population required to adhere to the vaccination policy in order to eradicate the disease, that resembles a well-known threshold for preventing an outbreak with an imperfect vaccine. We also investigate the consequences of unequal vaccine access in a population and prove that, under reasonable assumptions, fair vaccine allocation is the optimal strategy to prevent endemicity.

Populations and Evolution,Probability

Prenatal and early-life exposures alter expression of innate immunity genes: the PASTURE cohort study.

Incorporating Game Theory Into Voluntary Vaccination

The Vaccinee's Dilemma: Individual-level Decisions, Self- Organization & Influenza Epidemics

Individual decisions to vaccinate one's child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives

Rational behavior is a ‘double-edged sword’ when considering voluntary vaccination

Imperfect Vaccination Evolutionary Game Incorporating Individual Social Difference and Subjective Perception

Vaccination Dilemma in the thermodynamic limit

Voluntary vaccination dilemma with evolving psychological perceptions.

Simple economics of vaccination: public policies and incentives

Optimal vaccination: Various (counter) intuitive examples

Inviting free-riders or appealing to prosocial behavior? Game-theoretical reflections on communicating herd immunity in vaccine advocacy.

Flexible imitation suppresses epidemics through better vaccination

Stochastic games of parental vaccination decision making and bounded rationality

Imitation Dynamics of Vaccination Behaviour on Social Networks

Dynamic vaccination game in a heterogeneous mixing population

Individual Vaccination as Nash Equilibrium in a SIR Model with Application to the 2009–2010 Influenza A (H1N1) Epidemic in France

Individual vaccination as Nash equilibrium in a SIR model with application to the 2009-10 Influenza A(H1N1) epidemic in France

Imperfect Vaccine Aggravates the Long-Standing Dilemma of Voluntary Vaccination

Modelling the impact of opinion flexibility on the vaccination choices during epidemics

Evolutionary dynamics of voluntary vaccination for imperfect multi-efficacy vaccines

Optimal Vaccination Policy to Prevent Endemicity: A Stochastic Model