Direct Photoaffinity Labeling of Phosphofructokinase Using Adenosine Derivatives *

J. Ferguson,Mark Maclnnes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb22089.x
IF: 6.499
1980-06-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:We have been concerned with reactions between cyclic nucleotides and cytoplasmic receptor proteins that recognize and interact with these biologically important effector molecules. In 1974, we reported‘ that ultraviolet (uv) irradiation of testicular cyclic nucleotide binding proteins in the presence of radioactive cyclic 3’,5’-adenosine monophosphate (CAMP) or cyclic 3’3-guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) results in a time-dependent incorporation of the isotope into the binding proteins. We gave evidence for the specificity of this reaction, both in terms of the protein and cyclic nucleotide involved. We also demonstrated that the cyclic nucleotide molecule was incorporated intact, as evidenced by the fact that [8-’H]cAMP, (U-’’Cadenine1cAMP and [32P]cAMP were equally effective as labels. Incorporation of both cAMP and cGMP was found to be a saturable process, with half-maximal incorporation occurring at a ligand concentration comparable to the dissociation constants of these compounds and the regulatory subunits of cyclic nucleotide responsive protein kinases. Action spectra of the reactions indicated that peak photoincorporation occurred at a wavelength of 280 nm on irradiation with either cAMP or cGMP.’ Ability to photoincorporate these ligands paralleled the measured noncovalent binding capacity for the ligands in a number of tissues ~ t u d i e d . ~ We here describe a similar photoincorporation reaction using labeled CAMP, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as probe ligands, and the enzyme phosphofructokinase (PFK) as the “receptor protein.” Skeletal muscle phosphofructokinase is a well-characterized enzyme that normally exists as a tetrameric molecule. Its monomeric subunits, each with a molecular weight of about 90,000 daltons, are catalytically active. They are inhibited by adenosine triphosphate (ATP), one of the substrates of the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme. This inhibition is released in the presence of AMP, ADP, or CAMP. each of which presumably competes for binding at the site a t which ATP binding causes inhibition. The kinetics of noncovalent binding of each of these ligands to PFK has been well character i~ed.~ The known high affinity between cAMP and PFK ( K d 1 pM). as well as the commercial availability of the purified enzyme, prompted us to evaluate PFK as a model “binding protein” in our studies on direct photoaffinity labeling using these adenosine derivatives as ligands. Brunswick and Cooperman used PFK for
What problem does this paper attempt to address?