Violent fasciculations may not signal pseudocholinesterase deficiency.

M. Sosis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198505000-00021
1985-05-01
Abstract:We read with interest the recent report by Glasser (1) on violent fasciculations in a patient found to have pseudocholinesterase deficiency. Glasser suggests that this occurrence may be a useful observation in detecting this deficiency. Glasser cites work by Baraka (2) to show that patients with normal pseudocholinesterase will not have violent fasciculations after 10 mg of succinylcholine. Other authors, using the "self-taming" technique of injecting 10 mg of succinylcholine before a subsequent larger dose report different results. Brodsky et al. (3) and Siler et al. (4) reported "3 +" (maximum) fasciculations after 10 mg of succinylcholine in 10 and 4% of their normal patients, respectively. I have used this self-taming technique personally on several hundred patients, and I estimate violent fasciculations to have occurred in 5% of those receiving an initial 10-mg dose. Lee-Son et al. (5) and Azar and Betcher (6) report the use of minute doses of succinylcholine in patients known to have pseudocholinesterase deficiency. The doses given to produce twitch depression of 90% were on the order of 7 mg. No mention of fasciculations, violent or otherwise, was made. I have used the same technique on a patient with pseudocholinesterase deficiency, also noting no fasciculations. I conclude that violent fasciculations may occur in normal patients approximately 5% of the time when 10 mg of succinylcholine is administered. Although only a small number of cases is reported, it would appear that no fasciculations may occur when giving a smaller dose to patients with pseudocholinesterase deficiency. I therefore question both the sensitivity and specificity of this method as a means of detecting pseudocholinesterase deficiency. Instead, I advocate the method proposed by Savarese (7) whereby 0.1 mg/kg of succinylcholine is administered to a patient after anesthesia is induced. A duration of apnea of greater than 5 min should be cause for withholding further succinylcholine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?