In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis

Siquan Shen,Chengkang Tang,Weiwei Yang,Li Ding,Renru Han,Qingyu Shi,Yan Guo,Dandan Yin,Fupin Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2024.2356146

2024-06-05

Emerging Microbes & Infections

Abstract:Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the bla KPC . We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo bla KPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the bla KPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and bla KPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various bla KPC-2 variants, including bla KPC-25 , bla KPC-127 , bla KPC-100 , bla KPC-128 , bla KPC-137 , bla KPC-138 , bla KPC-144 and bla KPC-180 . Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased bla KPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as bla KPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the bla KPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a bla KPC-33 -producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from bla KPC-2 ) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The bla KPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to bla KPC-2 , rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem this paper attempts to address is: **The emergence and mechanisms of KPC-type carbapenemase variants during the treatment with Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CZA)**.

Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Simulation of KPC mutations during CZA treatment**: Simulating the process of KPC mutations in vitro to study the impact of different concentrations of CZA on KPC mutations.
2. **Phenotypic changes after mutation**: Analyzing the changes in antibiotic sensitivity of the mutated strains, particularly the sensitivity to CZA and carbapenem antibiotics.
3. **Study of mutation mechanisms**: Investigating the specific mechanisms of KPC gene mutations, including gene structure, expression levels, and enzymatic kinetic properties.
4. **Reversibility of KPC mutant strains**: Studying whether mutant strains like KPC-33 can revert to the wild-type KPC-2 when using other carbapenem antibiotics (such as Imipenem and Meropenem).
5. **Risk factors in clinical application**: Assessing the impact of clinical use of CZA on KPC mutations and how to optimize the use of CZA to reduce the occurrence of resistance.

Through these studies, the paper aims to provide scientific evidence for the clinical treatment of infections caused by KPC-type carbapenemase-producing resistant bacteria, guiding more rational drug use strategies.