Clinical and radiographic outcomes of zirconia dental implants—A systematic review and meta‐analysis
S. Roehling,M. Gahlert,M. Bacevic,H. Woelfler,I. Laleman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14133
2023-09-27
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Abstract:Abstract Objectives For the present review, the following focused question was addressed: In patients with root‐analog dental implants, what is the effect of implants made of other materials than titanium (alloy) on implant survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), and technical and biological complications after at least 5 years. Materials and Methods An electronic (Medline, Embase, Web of Science) search was performed to identify observational clinical studies published from January 2000 investigating a minimum of 20 commercially available zirconia implants with a mean follow‐up of at least 60 months. Primary outcome was implant survival, secondary outcomes included peri‐implant MBL, probing depths (PDs), and technical and biological complications. Meta‐analyses were performed to evaluate implant survival, MBL, and PD. Results From 5129 titles, 580 abstracts were selected, and 111 full‐text articles were screened. Finally, 4 prospective and 2 retrospective observational clinical cohort studies were included for data extraction. Meta‐analyses estimated after 5 years of loading mean values of 97.2% (95% CI 94.7–99.1) for survival (277 implants, 221 patients), 1.1 mm (95% CI: 0.9–1.3) for MBL (229 implants, 173 patients), and 3.0 mm (95% CI 2.5–3.4) for PDs (231 implants, 175 patients). Conclusions After 5 years, commercially available zirconia implants showed reliable clinical performance based on survival rates, MBL, and PD values. However, more well‐designed prospective clinical studies and randomized clinical trials investigating titanium and zirconia implants are needed to confirm the presently evaluated promising outcomes.
engineering, biomedical,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine