Therapeutic effects of various initial combinations of chemotherapy including clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease

Naoki Hasegawa,Tomoyasu Nishimura,Sumire Ohtani,Kei Takeshita,Koichi Fukunaga,Sadatomo Tasaka,Tetsuya Urano,Koudou Ishii,Mamoru Miyairi,Akitoshi Ishizaka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-2567
IF: 9.6
Chest
Abstract:Background: The objective of this study was to find an optimal initial combination chemotherapy that includes clarithromycin (CAM) for treatment-naive patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease, as assessed by microbiological conversion using a Mycobacterium growth indicator tube (MGIT). Methods: Thirty-four patients with treatment-naive MAC pulmonary disease (determined using 1997 American Thoracic Society criteria) were evaluated retrospectively. They demonstrated a nodular and bronchiectatic pattern without cavity on high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans. The following three regimens were administered: regimen A (n = 9) consisted of CAM (400 mg/d), ethambutol (EB) [750 mg/d], and rifampicin (RFP) [450 mg/d]; regimen B (n = 12) consisted of CAM (800 mg/d), EB (750 mg/d), and RFP (450 mg/d); and regimen C (n = 13) consisted of CAM (800 mg/d), EB (1,000 mg/d), and RFP (600 mg/d) during the first 2 months followed by a reduction of the dosage of EB from 1,000 to 750 mg/d. Gender, age, BMI, and HRCT scan finding scores were not significantly different among the three groups. Chemotherapy was continued for 18 months. Sputum culture was periodically assessed by MGIT. Results: Culture conversion at 18 months in regimen A (55.6%), which included a daily dosage of 400 mg of CAM (9.5 mg/kg), was significantly inferior to that in regimen B (91.7%), which included daily 800 mg of CAM (17.6 mg/kg; p < 0.05), but regimen B and C (92.3%) showed no between-group difference after > 18 months of chemotherapy. Conclusions: The higher dose of CAM allowed for better culture conversion. Daily combination chemotherapy that includes CAM (800 mg) seems appropriate as an initial treatment against treatment-naive patients with nodular and bronchiectatic MAC pulmonary disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?