Abstract:Objective: Prediction of outcomes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains challenging, with a lack of standardized tools to guide perioperative management. We used machine learning (ML) to develop automated algorithms that predict outcomes following CEA. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify patients who underwent CEA between 2003 and 2022. We identified 71 potential predictor variables (features) from the index hospitalization (43 preoperative [demographic/clinical], 21 intraoperative [procedural], and 7 postoperative [in-hospital complications]). The primary outcome was stroke or death at 1 year following CEA. Our data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we trained six ML models using preoperative features (Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). After selecting the best performing algorithm, additional models were built using intra- and postoperative data. Model robustness was evaluated using calibration plots and Brier scores. Performance was assessed on subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, symptom status, and urgency of surgery. Results: Overall, 166,369 patients underwent CEA during the study period. In total, 7749 patients (4.7%) had the primary outcome of stroke or death at 1 year. Patients with an outcome were older with more comorbidities, had poorer functional status, and demonstrated higher risk anatomic features. They were also more likely to undergo intraoperative surgical re-exploration and have in-hospital complications. Our best performing prediction model at the preoperative stage was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.91). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and existing tools in the literature demonstrate AUROCs ranging from 0.58 to 0.74. Our XGBoost models maintained excellent performance at the intra- and postoperative stages, with AUROCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-0.91) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with Brier scores of 0.15 (preoperative), 0.14 (intraoperative), and 0.11 (postoperative). Of the top 10 predictors, eight were preoperative features, including comorbidities, functional status, and previous procedures. Model performance remained robust on all subgroup analyses. Conclusions: We developed ML models that accurately predict outcomes following CEA. Our algorithms perform better than logistic regression and existing tools, and therefore, have potential for important utility in guiding perioperative risk mitigation strategies to prevent adverse outcomes.

Enhancing Transvenous Lead Extraction Risk Prediction: Integrating Imaging Biomarkers into Machine Learning Models

A machine learning-based approach for the prediction of periprocedural myocardial infarction by using routine data

Predictors for Adverse Events During Cardiac Lead Extraction - Experience from a Large Single Centre.

Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy

Machine Learning to Predict Long-Term Cardiac-Relative Prognosis in Patients With Extra-Cardiac Vascular Disease

Improving cardiovascular risk prediction with machine learning: a focus on perivascular adipose tissue characteristics

Machine learning-based prediction of early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: insights from a large multicenter study

Deep learning-based radiomics of computed tomography angiography to predict adverse events after initial endovascular repair for acute uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection

Explainable machine learning using echocardiography to improve risk prediction in patients with chronic coronary syndrome

Machine Learning to Dynamically Predict In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: Results From the CHAT-1 Study

Machine Learning for Prediction of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Using Clinical and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Variables

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Lung Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning

Predicting hematoma expansion using machine learning: An exploratory analysis of the ATACH 2 trial

Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting

Machine Learning Predicts Cancer-Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Clinically Available Variables

Risk Prediction for Non-cardiac Surgery Using the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram: An Explainable Deep Learning Approach

Impact of applying machine learning to the electronic medical record on prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty

Prognostic prediction of cardiovascular adverse events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning

Abstract MP32: Machine Learning Models Identify Predictors of Poor Outcome in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke