Setting-aside cropland did not reduce greenhouse gas emissions from a drained peat soil in Sweden

Hannes Keck,Katharina H. E. Meurer,Sabine Jordan,Thomas Kätterer,David Hadden,Achim Grelle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1386134
IF: 5.411
2024-05-30
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Abstract:In the process of their formation, northern peatlands were accumulating vast amounts of carbon (C). When drained for agricultural use, a large proportion of that C is oxidized and emitted as carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), turning those peatlands to strong CO 2 emitters. As a mitigation option, setting-aside farmland on drained peat is being incentivized by policies, but recent evidence casts doubt on these policies' efficiency for greenhouse gas (GHG) emission mitigation. To investigate the effects of setting-aside farmland on GHG fluxes from a Swedish peatland, we measured CO 2 , nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes on two adjacent sites under contrasting management. The cultivated (CL) site was used for cereal production (wheat or barley) and the set-aside (SA) site was under permanent grassland. Carbon dioxide fluxes were measured from 2013 to 2019 using the eddy covariance (EC) method. Additionally, CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 fluxes were measured during the growing seasons of 2018–2020, using transparent and opaque chambers on vegetated plots and on bare peat. The cumulative CO 2 fluxes measured by EC over the measurement period were 0.97 (±0.05) and 2.09 (±0.17) kg m −2 with annual average losses of 0.16 and 0.41 kg CO 2 m −2 yr −1 for the CL and SA site, respectively. Thus, the SA site acted as a stronger CO 2 source than the CL site. Both sites' contribution to global warming, calculated on basis of the chamber measurements, was dominated by CO 2 . The contribution of the SA site was higher than that of the CL site. Nitrous oxide emissions were low at both sites with higher emissions from the CL site for transparent measurements and measurements on bare peat. Whereas, CH 4 uptake was highest on the SA grassland. Thus, on the basis of our study, we found no evidence that setting-aside farmland on shallow drained peat soils will reduce GHG emissions or even turn the peatland into a C sink.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?