Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO) Scale: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation for Hebrew-Speaking Patients

Netanel Eisenbach,Matti Mizrachi,Amiel A. Dror,Rania Faris,Tali Jane Ohayon,Ohad Ronen,Eyal Sela
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2297-4494
2024-05-01
Facial Plastic Surgery
Abstract:Patient-reported outcomes questionnaires are accepted measurement tools to evaluate procedures results. The Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO) scale is an English-language validated and reliable quality-of-life instrument that evaluates both functional and aesthetic outcomes after rhinoplasty, and is not available in Hebrew. We followed the forward-and-back-translation method, defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Translation of the RHINO scale and merging it into one version were performed, following back-translation and validation on native Hebrew-speaking patients who underwent rhinoplasty and control healthy group. Lastly, we review and analyzed the results. The translated questionnaire had high reliability measures, demonstrating homogeneity (α value 0.800 in the rhinoplasty group and 0.896 in the control group), test–retest reproducibility with no significant difference ( p = 0.5), and high agreement scores represented by the Bland–Altman plot (95% limits of agreement ranged from 8.78 to 9.80). Validity demonstrated by significant differences between the two study groups' mean questionnaire scores ( p < 0.001 for rhinoplasty vs. controls, p < 0.001 for preoperative vs. postoperative, and p = 0.002 for postoperative vs. control group) and also between the aesthetic scores and functional scores of the rhinoplasty group before and after the surgery ( p < 0.001). There were no reported understanding problems. The Hebrew version of the RHINO scale is a reliable and valid tool for pre- and post-rhinoplasty surgery outcomes measuring among Hebrew-speaking patients, and can improve coordination of expectations, follow-up, and quantify subjective evaluation of the surgery. Level of evidence: IV. All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (NHR 011619) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Medical and personal information was obtained from the questionnaire and from medical records, all of which remained anonymous. The questionnaire was used for the purpose of clinical evaluation of patients; therefore, responding to the questionnaire was considered as informed consent for participating in the research. Approval was received from the original RHINO scale developer to translate and validate the questionnaire into Hebrew. Accepted Manuscript online: 01 April 2024 Article published online: 30 April 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?