Abstract:Domestic trade flourishes with economic development and the spatial separation of production and consumption. Therefore, the prosperity of trade is accompanied by the transfer of pollution from the demand side to the supply side, which could potentially worsen the environmental quality of the supply side. Despite a large number of studies on the pollution haven hypothesis in international trade, little attention has been paid to testing the hypothesis in domestic trade. Here, combining a multiregional input–output analysis and a gravity model of trade in China, we provide an empirical test to address this problem for the first time. We also assess the factors affecting the SO2 emissions embodied in trade, including population, economic development, coal consumption, distance, and environmental regulations. We found that domestic trade contributed approximate one third of the total SO2 emissions in China, and interprovincial transfers of SO2 embodied in trade were significantly determined by the population, economic development, coal consumption of the trade pairs, as well as their distance. SO2 emission mitigation policies, such as emission reduction target and sulfur dioxide control zone, has a more significant influence on the direct transfer of SO2 emission via direct bilateral trade, while their effects were largely offset by indirect trade (through third–party transfers). Our results do not support the pollution haven hypothesis existed in domestic trade in China during 2007–2012. Our paper sets an example and provides a reference for the domestic pollution transfer problem from an econometric perspective. Further attempts on testing pollution haven hypothesis in consideration of various pollutants are still needed to arrive at a robust conclusion.

Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration

The Pollution Haven Strikes Back?–evidence from Air Quality Daily Variation in the Jing-Jin-Ji Region of China

An economic analysis of ‘home appliances going to the countryside’ in China

Quantifying the "Pollution Haven": an Existing Effect but an Unsupported Hypothesis

Can industrial agglomeration promote pollution agglomeration? Evidence from China

Environmental Regulation and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Do Environmental Regulation Measures Matter?

How do environmental regulations affect industrial dynamics? Evidence from China's pollution-intensive industries

Industry relocation or emission relocation? Visualizing and decomposing the dislocation between China's economy and carbon emissions

Do polluting plants locate in the borders of jurisdictions? Evidence from China

Environmental Regulation and the Effect of ＂pollution Haven＂ on Regional Industrial Layout of China

Is There a Pollution Haven Effect? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

Pollution Haven Hypothesis of Domestic Trade in China: A Perspective of SO2 Emissions.

Domestic Pollution Havens: Linking Interregional Capital Flight and Water Pollution Regulation in China

Re-Examination of the Relationship between Industrial Agglomeration and Haze Pollution: From the Perspective of the Spatial Moderating Effect of Environmental Regulation

Towards achieving the sustainable development goal of industry: How does industrial agglomeration affect air pollution?

Does industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution have a spatial spillover effect?: taking panel data of resource-based cities in China as an example

A multi-regional input–output analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis from the perspective of global production fragmentation

The pollution halo effect of technology spillover and pollution haven effect of economic growth in agricultural foreign trade: two sides of the same coin?

Can industrial agglomeration achieve the emission-reduction effect?

Internal trade and environmental policy effectiveness in developing countries: A binary endogenous growth model with regional Heterogeneity

The impact of environmental regulation and industrial agglomeration on air pollution: on the spatial spillover perspective