Lipid peroxidation in early type 1 diabetes mellitus is unassociated with oxidative damage to DNA

Robert D Hoeldtke,Kimberly D Bryner,Linda L Corum,Gerald R Hobbs,Knox Van Dyke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2009.01.016
IF: 13.934
Metabolism
Abstract:Oxidative stress damages DNA in experimental diabetes, and in vitro studies have suggested that it is linked to lipid peroxidation. The objective of the study was to determine whether lipid peroxidation, as assessed with malondialdehyde excretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus, is associated with oxidative damage to DNA, as assessed from 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine excretion. A 3-year longitudinal study of recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus was performed. Age- and sex-matched control subjects were studied once. Patients were studied as inpatients at West Virginia University Hospitals. Thirty-seven patients with recent-onset (2-22 months) type 1 diabetes mellitus (male, 10; female, 27) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of oxidative stress. The mean age of the patients was 20 years. None of the patients had hyperlipidemia or were treated with lipid-lowering drugs. Only 1 patient had hypertension and was being treated with beta-adrenergic blocking therapy. Thirty-six patients completed the study; one withdrew after the second evaluation. Lipid peroxidation was assessed by measuring malondialdehyde excretion. Oxidative damage to DNA was assessed from 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine excretion. Malondialdehyde excretion was increased in the diabetic patients at the first evaluation (2.43 +/- 0.31 micromol/g creatinine), second evaluation (2.34 +/- 0.24), and third evaluation (1.93 +/- 0.15) compared with control subjects (1.51 +/- 0.11) (P < .005). 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine excretion, however, was not increased in the diabetic patients. There was no correlation between malondialdehyde and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine excretion. We confirmed the presence of oxidative stress in early diabetes as assessed from malondialdehyde excretion. We were unable, however, to confirm oxidative damage to DNA in this cohort of patients; and there was no evidence of a correlation between lipid peroxidation and DNA damage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?