Third-generation antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy--a balancing act.

M. Vankemmelbeke,L. Durrant
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2016-0002
2016-02-19
Therapeutic Delivery
Abstract:2016 Historical perspective The use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to target toxic payloads to cancer cells has a long and convoluted history. Early experiments with first-generation antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) consisting of conventional chemotherapy linked to target-specific mAbs underwhelmed due to insufficient potency of the payload and/or toxicity due to instability of the ADC and systemic loss of the drug. Second-generation ADCs used more potent (100–1000-fold) tubulin-targeting agents such as the auristatins (monomethyl auristatin E [MMAE], monomethyl auristatin F [MMAF]) and maytansinoids (DM1, DM4) or DNA-targeting agents such as the calicheamicins, and led to the relatively recent US FDA approval of two microtubule-inhibiting ADCs: brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35, Acetris, 2011) for Hodgkin and anaplastic large cell lymphoma and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, Kadcyla, 2013) for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. These approvals have led to an explosion in ADC R&D, with currently over 50 ADCs undergoing clinical evaluation [1].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?