How well do multi-fire danger rating indices represent China forest fire variations across multi-time scales?

Yuxian Pan,Jing Yang,Qichao Yao,Stacey New,Bao Qing,Deliang Chen,Chunming Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad2d3d
IF: 6.7
2024-02-27
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:To better support wildfire predictions and risk assessment, multiple fire danger rating indices (FDRIs) have been developed but their credibility in China remains obscure. Compared with the satellite fire observations, thirteen FDRIs are evaluated for the historical (2003–2021) forest fire frequency in China from four different time scales: active seasons, trends, interannual variations (IAV) and discrimination of fire/non-fire days (DFD). Most FDRIs effectively capture the double active seasons over Southwest China and the dominant active season over Northeast and South China but fail over the other regions. FDRIs with cloud cover perform better in climatological seasonality. All FDRIs fail to reproduce the significant decreasing trend of forest fires speculatively due to local fire management and discordant changes in meteorological elements. Most FDRIs have the advantages of the IAV and DFD over Southwest China but exhibit deficiencies over the other regions. FDRIs incorporating wind speed perform best in representing both IAV and DFD, indicating the indispensable effect of surface wind on the interannual/daily variation of fire danger. This study provides a credible reference for utilizing FDRIs in China, as well as offers insights for better developing regional FDRIs to represent different time-scale variations.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?