Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: Training and credentialing for carotid stenting—Multispecialty consensus recommendations

K. Rosenfield
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20265
2005-01-01
Abstract:Percutaneous carotid intervention with distal embolic protection is a rapidly emerging field that is being incorporated into interventional cardiovascular, vascular surgery, vascular medicine, and interventional radiology practices. The recently published SAPPHIRE trial has established carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients as an effective alternative to carotid endarterectomy [1]. Contemporary techniques for carotid stenting and embolic protection were developed by multiple specialists, including interventional cardiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and vascular medicine specialists, transferring technology, interventional skills, and adjunctive medical therapies perfected in their coronary and peripheral vascular experience [1–5]. Cardiologists, as board-certified cardiovascular specialists, have recognized the systemic nature of atherosclerotic disease and appropriately taken an increasingly active role in the management of noncardiac vascular diseases, including stroke prevention. Comprehensive and coordinated management of cardiovascular disease (both cardiac and noncardiac) has become the standard of care in contemporary clinical and interventional practice. Vascular surgeons have traditionally performed the majority of carotid endarterectomy procedures and helped validate carotid revascularization as an effective therapy for stroke prevention. Vascular surgeons have recently gained experience in percutaneous catheterbased therapies and increasingly utilize the endovascular approach to treat a wide variety of peripheral vascular disorders. As carotid stenting has emerged as an alternative for patients at increased risk for surgery, it is appropriate that vascular surgery will have a significant role in this important therapy for carotid bifurcation disease. Similarly, physicians trained in vascular medicine frequently manage extracranial cerebrovascular disease, which is an essential element in the care of their patients with generalized vascular disease. Vascular medicine physicians, trained as interventionalists, will offer stenting as an alternative for treatment of carotid disease. The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations regarding physician training and credentialing to facilitate the safe and orderly dissemination of this new therapy into clinical practice. Prior to undertaking focused training in cerebral angiography and carotid stenting, physicians should first comply with the recommendations outlined in the recently published Clinical Competence Statement on Vascular Medicine and Catheter-Based Peripheral Vascular Interventions [6]. Our document should be viewed as an extension of that earlier competence statement on peripheral vascular interventions and should be considered to repre-
What problem does this paper attempt to address?