Abstract:Background: Criminal defendants may often exaggerate psychiatric symptoms either to appear non-accountable for their actions or to mitigate their imprisonment. Several psychometric tests have been proposed to detect malingering. These instruments are often validated by Simulation Design (SD) protocols, where normal participants are explicitly requested to either simulate a mental disorder or respond honestly. However, the real scenarios (clinical or forensic) are often very challenging because of the presence of genuine patients, so that tests accuracy frequently differs from that one obtained in well-controlled experimental settings. Here we assessed the effectiveness in criminal defendants of three well-known malingering-detecting tests (MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM) by using both Known-Group Comparison (KGC) and Simulation Design (SD) protocols. Methods: The study involved 151 male inmates. Participants to the KGC protocol were all characterized by a positive psychiatric history. They were considered as genuine patients (KGC_Controls) if they had some psychiatric disorders already before imprisonment and scored above the cutoff of SCL-90-R, a commonly used test for mental illness, and as suspected malingerers (KGC_SM) if they were diagnosed as psychiatric patients only after imprisonment and scored below the SCL-90-R cutoff. Participants to SD protocol had no history of psychiatric disease and scored below the SCL-90-R cutoff. They were randomly assigned to either group: Controls (requested to answer honestly, SD_Controls) and simulated malingerers (requested to feign a psychiatric disease, SD_SM). All participants were then submitted to MMPI-2, NIM and SIMS. Results: Results showed that while MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM were all effective in discriminating malingerers in the SD, SIMS only significantly discriminated between KGC_Controls and KGC_SM in the Known-Group Comparison. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves analysis confirmed the better sensitivity of SIMS with respect to the other tests but raised some issues on SIMS specificity. Discussion: Results support the sensitivity of SIMS for the detection of malingering in forensic populations. However, some specificity issues emerged suggesting that further research and a good forensic practice should keep into account multiple measures of malingering, including psychometric data, clinical and social history and current clinical situation. These methodological constraints must be kept in mind during detection of malingering in criminal defendants reporting psychiatric symptoms.

Detecting feigned impairment with the word list recognition of the Wechsler Memory Scale-3rd edition

Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Comparative analysis of freestanding and embedded performance validity tests

Detecting feigned cognitive impairment using pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words

Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury

Malingering assessment after severe traumatic brain injury in forensic psychology with a potential embedded symptom validity indicator of Symptom Checklist 90

The classification accuracy of Warrington's recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting

Cross-validation of incidental learning tasks from the WAIS-IV as a measure of memory

Detecting malingering mental illness in forensics: Known-Group Comparison and Simulation Design with MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM

Modern Scores for Traditional Tests - Review of the Diagnostic Potential of Scores Derived from Word List Learning Tests in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer's Disease

Cross-Validation of Supplemental Test of Memory Malingering Scores as Performance Validity Measures

Use of perceptual memory as a performance validity indicator: initial validation with simulated mild traumatic brain injury

Further Consideration of Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice: Comparison to the Recognition Memory Test-Words and Classification Accuracy in a Clinical Sample

Exploring the Semantic Structure of WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates using the Hub-and-Spoke Model

The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology Amnestic Disorders Scale (SIMS-AM) Is Insensitive to Cognitive Impairment While Accurately Identifying Invalid Cognitive Symptom Reporting

Utility of learning ratio scores from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Word List Memory Test in distinguishing patterns of cognitive decline in veterans referred for neuropsychological evaluation

Recall and recognition of similarities items in neuropsychological assessment: Memory, validity, and meaning

Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection

Neural correlates of feigned memory impairment.

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

Identifying Patients with Poststroke Mild Cognitive Impairment by Pattern Recognition of Working Memory Load-Related ERP

Optimizing Cognitive Assessment Outcome Measures for Alzheimer's Disease by Matching Wordlist Memory Test Features to Scoring Methodology