Competence or morality? Investigating how psychological distance moderates individuals' attitudes toward organizations' behavioral ambivalence

Yi-Sheng Hung,Shih-Yu Lo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05560-7

IF: 2.8

2024-01-12

Current Psychology

Abstract:Construal level theory (CLT) asserts that far psychological distances trigger abstract thoughts, whereas near psychological distances trigger concrete thoughts. Moreover, according to CLT, consumers prioritize the abstract perspective (e.g., the moral perspective) of an organization that is perceived to be distant. Thus, a moral-but-incompetent organization is favored over a competent-but-immoral one, although this trend reverses for an organization that is perceived to be near. Such an assertion has been corroborated by a previous study, albeit only with regard to the temporal and social dimensions of psychological distance. Therefore, the present study experimentally tested the other two dimensions of psychological distance—namely, the spatial dimension and the hypothetical dimension. The results revealed that the participants prioritized an organization's moral performance over its competence in relation to a spatially distant organization, although the order of prioritization was reversed for a spatially near organization. By contrast, the participants' prioritization of an organization's moral or competence performance did not vary between the hypothetically near and hypothetically far conditions. These findings provide insights relevant to the development of an organization's public relations and communications strategies concerning consumers.

psychology, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores how consumers balance an organization's competence and morality when evaluating it, especially how this balance changes under different psychological distances. The study is based on Construal Level Theory (CLT), which posits that greater psychological distance prompts abstract thinking, while closer psychological distance triggers concrete thinking.

### Research Objectives

The paper aims to address the following questions:

1. **The impact of different dimensions of psychological distance on consumer evaluations**: Previous research has only examined the impact of temporal and social dimensions of psychological distance on consumer evaluations. This paper further tests the impact of spatial and hypothetical dimensions of psychological distance on consumer evaluations.
2. **The impact of different types of organizations (for-profit and non-profit organizations) on consumer evaluations**: The study also explores the differences in consumer evaluations when an organization's competence and morality are mismatched, between for-profit and non-profit organizations.

### Key Findings

- **Impact of spatial distance**: When an organization is perceived as spatially distant from consumers, consumers tend to prioritize the organization's moral performance over its competence; conversely, when the organization is perceived as spatially close, the opposite is true.
- **Impact of hypothetical distance**: The experiment failed to successfully manipulate hypothetical distance, but analysis showed that under different hypothetical distance conditions, there was no significant change in consumers' prioritization of an organization's moral or competence performance.
- **Impact of different types of organizations**: For non-profit organizations, when their competence and morality are mismatched, consumers tend to place more importance on their moral performance; for for-profit organizations, consumers place more importance on their competence performance.

In summary, this paper supplements and refines the existing literature on the relationship between psychological distance, organizational competence, and morality through empirical research, providing valuable insights for organizations in formulating public relations and communication strategies.