Abstract:Recent studies have shown that atmospheric mass-loss powered by the cooling luminosity of a planet's core can explain the observed radius valley separating super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, even without photoevaporation. In this work, we investigate the dependence of this core-powered mass-loss mechanism on stellar mass ($M_\ast$), metallicity ($Z_\ast$) and age ($\tau_\ast$). Without making any changes to the underlying planet population, we find that the core-powered mass-loss model yields a shift in the radius valley to larger planet sizes around more massive stars with a slope given by $\text{d log}R_p/\text{d log}M_\ast \simeq 0.35$, in agreement with observations. To first order, this slope is driven by the dependence of core-powered mass-loss on the bolometric luminosity of the host star and is given by $\text{d log}R_p/\text{d log}M_\ast \simeq (3\alpha-2)/36 \simeq 0.33$, where $(L_\ast/L_\odot) = (M_\ast/M_\odot)^\alpha$ is the stellar mass-luminosity relation and $\alpha\simeq 4.6$ for the CKS dataset. We therefore find, in contrast to photoevaporation models, no evidence for a linear correlation between planet and stellar mass, but can't rule it out either. In addition, we show that the location of the radius valley is, to first order, independent of stellar age and metallicity. Since core-powered mass-loss proceeds over Gyr timescales, the abundance of super-Earths relative to sub-Neptunes increases with age but decreases with stellar metallicity. Finally, due the dependence of the envelope's cooling timescale on metallicity, we find that the radii of sub-Neptunes increase with metallicity and decrease with age with slopes given by $\text{d log}R_p/\text{d log}Z_\ast \simeq 0.1$ and $\text{d log}R_p/\text{d log}\tau_\ast \simeq -0.1$, respectively. We conclude with a series of observational tests that can differentiate between core-powered mass-loss and photoevaporation models.

Current Population Statistics Do Not Favor Photoevaporation over Core-Powered Mass Loss as the Dominant Cause of the Exoplanet Radius Gap

Photoevaporation versus core-powered mass-loss: model comparison with the 3D radius gap

Signatures of the Core-Powered Mass-Loss Mechanism in the Exoplanet Population: Dependence on Stellar Properties and Observational Predictions

Core-powered mass loss and the radius distribution of small exoplanets

Investigating the Atmospheric Mass Loss of the Kepler-105 Planets Straddling the Radius Gap

Mapping out the parameter space for photoevaporation and core-powered mass-loss

Unveiling the Planet Population at Birth

Evidence that Planets in the Radius Gap Do Not Resemble Their Neighbors

A radius valley between migrated steam worlds and evaporated rocky cores

Properties of the radius valley around low mass stars: Predictions from the core-powered mass-loss mechanism

A Unified Treatment of Kepler Occurrence to Trace Planet Evolution II: The Radius Cliff Formed by Atmospheric Escape

Evolution of the Radius Valley around Low-mass Stars from Kepler and K2

Exoplanet Radius Gap Dependence on Host Star Type

The radiative-convective gap: fact or fiction?

Evaporation of Low-mass Planet Atmospheres: Multidimensional Hydrodynamics with Consistent Thermochemistry

The evaporation of planetary atmosphere

Under the light of a new star: evolution of planetary atmospheres through protoplanetary disc dispersal and boil-off

Removal of Hot Saturns in Mass-Radius Plane by Runaway Mass Loss

A fading radius valley towards M-dwarfs, a persistent density valley across stellar types