Abstract:The cohesive collective motion (flocking, swarming) of autonomous agents is ubiquitously observed and exploited in both natural and man-made settings, thus, minimal models for its description are essential. In a model with continuous space and time we find that if two particles arrive symmetrically in a plane at a large angle, then (i) radial repulsion and (ii) linear self-propelling toward a fixed preferred speed are sufficient for them to depart at a smaller angle. For this local gain of momentum explicit velocity alignment is not necessary, nor are adhesion or attraction, inelasticity or anisotropy of the particles, or nonlinear drag. With many particles obeying these microscopic rules of motion we find that their spatial confinement to a square with periodic boundaries (which is an indirect form of attraction) leads to stable macroscopic ordering. As a function of the strength of added noise we see-at finite system sizes-a critical slowing down close to the order-disorder boundary and a discontinuous transition. After varying the density of particles at constant system size and varying the size of the system with constant particle density we predict that in the infinite system size (or density) limit the hysteresis loop disappears and the transition becomes continuous. We note that animals, humans, drones, etc., tend to move asynchronously and are often more responsive to motion than positions. Thus, for them velocity-based continuous models can provide higher precision than coordinate-based models. An additional characteristic and realistic feature of the model is that convergence to the ordered state is fastest at a finite density, which is in contrast to models applying (discontinuous) explicit velocity alignments and discretized time. To summarize, we find that the investigated model can provide a minimal description of flocking.

Comment on "Velocity and Speed Correlations in Hamiltonian Flocks" by M. Casiulis et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1911.06042" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.06042">arXiv:1911.06042</a>]

Reply to "Comment on "Velocity and Speed Correlations in Hamiltonian Flocks"

The Dynamic Spatial Structure of Flocks

Entropic forces in a non-equilibrium system: Flocks of birds

Keeping Speed and Distance for Aligned Motion

Fluctuation-Driven Flocking Movement in Three Dimensions and Scale-Free Correlation

Density distributions and depth in flocks

Invariance of velocity angles and flocking in the Inertial Spin model

Strong Casimir-like Forces in Flocking Active Matter

Bird Flocks as Condensed Matter

Out of equilibrium response and fluctuation-dissipation violations across scales in flocking systems

Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks

Flock2: A model for orientation-based social flocking

Active Ising Models of Flocking: A Field-Theoretic Approach

Comment on "Flocking without Alignment Interactions in Attractive Active Brownian Particles [

Flocking of a thermodynamic Cucker-Smale model with local velocity interactions

Discrete Laplacian thermostat for flocks and swarms: the fully conserved Inertial Spin Model

Silent Flocks

Discrete Laplacian thermostat for flocks and swarms: the fully conservedInertial Spin Model

Consequence of anisotropy on flocking: the discretized Vicsek model