Precision of flow sensing by self-communicating cells

Sean Fancher,Michael Vennettilli,Nicholas Hilgert,Andrew Mugler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.168101

2020-07-12

Abstract:Metastatic cancer cells detect the direction of lymphatic flow by self-communication: they secrete and detect a chemical which, due to the flow, returns to the cell surface anisotropically. The secretion rate is low, meaning detection noise may play an important role, but the sensory precision of this mechanism has not been explored. Here we derive the precision of flow sensing for two ubiquitous detection methods: absorption vs.\ reversible binding to surface receptors. We find that binding is more precise due to the fact that absorption distorts the signal that the cell aims to detect. Comparing to experiments, our results suggest that the cancer cells operate remarkably close to the physical detection limit. Our prediction that cells should bind the chemical reversibly, not absorb it, is supported by endocytosis data for this ligand-receptor pair.

Biological Physics,Cell Behavior

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about how metastatic cancer cells perceive the direction of lymphatic flow through the self - communication mechanism, and explores the precision of this perception mechanism. Specifically, the paper focuses on the process by which cells secrete and detect chemicals (such as CCL19 and CCL21). These chemicals exhibit anisotropy when they return to the cell surface under the action of lymphatic flow, thus providing information about the flow direction. Through theoretical analysis and experimental data, the paper compares the precision differences between the two main molecular detection methods - absorption and reversible binding to surface receptors - in perceiving the flow direction, aiming to reveal which method is more precise and how cells work near the physical detection limit.

### Main problems
1. **Physical feasibility of the self - communication mechanism**:
- Is it physically feasible for metastatic cancer cells to perceive the direction of lymphatic flow through the self - communication mechanism (autologous chemotaxis)?
- Given low flow rates and low secretion rates, can cells determine the flow direction by detecting thousands of molecules?

2. **Perception precision**:
- What are the precisions of cells in detecting the flow direction by the two methods of absorption or reversible binding to surface receptors respectively?
- Which method is more precise and why?

### Research background
- **Metastatic cancer cells**: Cancer cells can spread from the primary tumor to other parts of the body through the lymphatic system.
- **Self - communication mechanism**: Cancer cells secrete diffusible molecules (such as CCL19 and CCL21) and detect these molecules through surface receptors (such as CCR7), thereby perceiving the direction of lymphatic flow.
- **Physical parameters**: The lymphatic flow rate is very slow (usually 0.1 - 1 µm/s), while the diffusion coefficient of molecules is relatively high (about 130 - 160 µm²/s), resulting in a small Péclet number (Pe ≡ v₀a/D), indicating that diffusion dominates this process.

### Research methods
- **Theoretical modeling**: Using stochastic techniques and perturbation techniques in fluid mechanics, the precision limit of cells in perceiving the flow direction through the self - communication mechanism is derived.
- **Experimental verification**: Compare the theoretical results with experimental data to verify the accuracy of theoretical predictions.

### Main findings
- **Absorption vs. reversible binding**:
- **Absorption**: Absorption will reduce the anisotropy of the signal, resulting in lower detection precision.
- **Reversible binding**: Reversible binding will not reduce the anisotropy of the signal, so the detection precision is higher.
- **Physical detection limit**:
- The paper derives an expression similar to Berg - Purcell, indicating that the detection precision is limited by the Péclet number, the secretion rate and the integration time.
- The experimental results show that cells work near the physical detection limit, indicating that their perception precision is very high.

### Conclusions
- This study reveals the physical principles of metastatic cancer cells in perceiving the direction of lymphatic flow through the self - communication mechanism, and provides a quantitative precision analysis.
- The paper predicts that reversible binding is more precise than absorption, and this prediction is supported by endocytosis data.
- The research results are of great significance for understanding the migration mechanism of cancer cells, and provide a theoretical basis for further exploring the influence of cell geometry and other factors on perception precision.