Abstract:A network, whose nodes are genes and whose directed edges represent positive or negative influences of a regulatory gene and its targets, is often used as a representation of causality. To infer a network, researchers often develop a machine learning model and then evaluate the model based on its match with experimentally verified "gold standard" edges. The desired result of such a model is a network that may extend the gold standard edges. Since networks are a form of visual representation, one can compare their utility with architectural or machine blueprints. Blueprints are clearly useful because they provide precise guidance to builders in construction. If the primary role of gene regulatory networks is to characterize causality, then such networks should be good tools of prediction because prediction is the actionable benefit of knowing causality. But are they? In this paper, we compare prediction quality based on "gold standard" regulatory edges from previous experimental work with non-linear models inferred from time series data across four different species. We show that the same non-linear machine learning models have better predictive performance, with improvements from 5.3% to 25.3% in terms of the reduction in the root mean square error (RMSE) compared with the same models based on the gold standard edges. Having established that networks fail to characterize causality properly, we suggest that causality research should focus on four goals: (i) predictive accuracy; (ii) a parsimonious enumeration of predictive regulatory genes for each target gene g ; (iii) the identification of disjoint sets of predictive regulatory genes for each target g of roughly equal accuracy; and (iv) the construction of a bipartite network (whose node types are genes and models) representation of causality. We provide algorithms for all goals.

The Probabilistic Backbone of Data-Driven Complex Networks: An example in Climate

Learning Cluster Causal Diagrams: an Information-Theoretic Approach

Fast & Efficient Learning of Bayesian Networks from Data: Knowledge Discovery and Causality

A Full Bayesian Approach to Sparse Network Inference Using Heterogeneous Datasets

Correlated random networks

Pitfalls of Climate Network Construction: A Statistical Perspective

Functional Bayesian networks for discovering causality from multivariate functional data

From Undirected Dependence to Directed Causality: A Novel Bayesian Learning Approach

Learning the Structure of Dynamic Probabilistic Networks

Complex networks in climate dynamics - Comparing linear and nonlinear network construction methods

Understanding complex systems through differential causal networks

Discovering universal statistical laws of complex networks

Bipartite networks represent causality better than simple networks: evidence, algorithms, and applications

Correlation networks: Interdisciplinary approaches beyond thresholding

Probabilistic graphs using coupled random variables

A survey of Bayesian Network structure learning

Reliable and Efficient Inference of Bayesian Networks from Sparse Data by Statistical Learning Theory

What do we learn from correlations of local and global network properties?

Bayesian networks and probabilistic reasoning about scientific evidence when there is a lack of data

Non-parametric regression for networks

Diversity of information pathways drives scaling and sparsity in real-world networks