Abstract:In this article, we explore the potential of enhancing academic prose and idea generation by fine-tuning a large language model (here, GPT-3) on one's own previously published writings: AUTOGEN ("AI Unique Tailored Output GENerator"). We develop, test, and describe three distinct AUTOGEN models trained on the prior scholarly output of three of the current authors (SBM, BDE, JS), with a fourth model trained on the combined works of all three. Our AUTOGEN models demonstrate greater variance in quality than the base GPT-3 model, with many outputs outperforming the base model in format, style, overall quality, and novel idea generation. As proof of principle, we present and discuss examples of AUTOGEN-written sections of existing and hypothetical research papers. We further discuss ethical opportunities, concerns, and open questions associated with personalized academic prose and idea generators. Ethical opportunities for personalized LLMs such as AUTOGEN include increased productivity, preservation of writing styles and cultural traditions, and aiding consensus building. However, ethical concerns arise due to the potential for personalized LLMs to reduce output diversity, violate privacy and intellectual property rights, and facilitate plagiarism or fraud. The use of coauthored or multiple-source trained models further complicates issues surrounding ownership and attribution. Open questions concern a potential credit-blame asymmetry for LLM outputs, the legitimacy of licensing agreements in authorship ascription, and the ethical implications of coauthorship attribution for data contributors. Ensuring the output is sufficiently distinct from the source material is crucial to maintaining ethical standards in academic writing. These opportunities, risks, and open issues highlight the intricate ethical landscape surrounding the use of personalized LLMs in academia. We also discuss open technical questions concerning the integration of AUTOGEN-style personalized LLMs with other LLMs, such as GPT-4, for iterative refinement and improvement of generated text. In conclusion, we argue that AUTOGEN-style personalized LLMs offer significant potential benefits in terms of both prose generation and, to a lesser extent, idea generation. If associated ethical issues are appropriately addressed, AUTOGEN alone or in combination with other LLMs can be seen as a potent form of academic enhancement.

Neural Academic Paper Generation

A Hierarchical Neural Autoencoder for Paragraphs and Documents

Generating Scientific Articles with Machine Learning

Neural Text Generation from Structured Data with Application to the Biography Domain

Automated Source Code Generation and Auto-completion Using Deep Learning: Comparing and Discussing Current Language-Model-Related Approaches

Neural Text Generation: Past, Present and Beyond

Automatic Generation of Citation Texts in Scholarly Papers: A Pilot Study.

Can pre-trained language models generate titles for research papers?

A Simple yet Efficient Ensemble Approach for AI-generated Text Detection

Text Generation Based on Generative Adversarial Nets with Latent Variable

Russian Natural Language Generation: Creation of a Language Modelling Dataset and Evaluation with Modern Neural Architectures

Neural Language Generation: Formulation, Methods, and Evaluation

Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approaches

Anatomy of Neural Language Models

A Character-Centric Neural Model For Automated Story Generation

Neural Authorship Attribution: Stylometric Analysis on Large Language Models

AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle

Recent Advances in Neural Text Generation: A Task-Agnostic Survey

Automatic Title Generation for Learning Resources and Pathways with Pre-trained Transformer Models

Deep dive into language traits of AI-generated Abstracts

AcademicGPT: Empowering Academic Research