Abstract:We start with the history of cognitive radar, where origins of the PAC, Fuster research on cognition and principals of cognition are provided. Fuster describes five cognitive functions: perception, memory, attention, language, and intelligence. We describe the Perception-Action Cyclec as it applies to cognitive radar, and then discuss long-term memory, memory storage, memory retrieval and working memory. A comparison between memory in human cognition and cognitive radar is given as well. Attention is another function described by Fuster, and we have given the comparison of attention in human cognition and cognitive radar. We talk about the four functional blocks from the PAC: Bayesian filter, feedback information, dynamic programming and state-space model for the radar environment. Then, to show that the PAC improves the tracking accuracy of Cognitive Radar over Traditional Active Radar, we have provided simulation results. In the simulation, three nonlinear filters: Cubature Kalman Filter, Unscented Kalman Filter and Extended Kalman Filter are compared. Based on the results, radars implemented with CKF perform better than the radars implemented with UKF or radars implemented with EKF. Further, radar with EKF has the worst accuracy and has the biggest computation load because of derivation and evaluation of Jacobian matrices. We suggest using the concept of risk management to better control parameters and improve performance in cognitive radar. We believe, spectrum sensing can be seen as a potential interest to be used in cognitive radar and we propose a new approach Probabilistic ICA which will presumably reduce noise based on estimation error in cognitive radar. Parallel computing is a concept based on divide and conquers mechanism, and we suggest using the parallel computing approach in cognitive radar by doing complicated calculations or tasks to reduce processing time.

Identifying Cognitive Radars -- Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Revealed Preferences

Meta-Cognition. An Inverse-Inverse Reinforcement Learning Approach for Cognitive Radars

Adversarial Radar Inference. From Inverse Tracking to Inverse Reinforcement Learning of Cognitive Radar

Identifying Coordination in a Cognitive Radar Network -- A Multi-Objective Inverse Reinforcement Learning Approach

How can a Cognitive Radar Mask its Cognition?

How can a Radar Mask its Cognition?

Mode Selection in Cognitive Radar Networks

Experimental Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Spectrum Sharing Radar

Cognitive Radars: A Reality?

Statistical Detection of Coordination in a Cognitive Radar Network through Inverse Multi-objective Optimization

When is Cognitive Radar Beneficial?

Game Theory and Reinforcement Learning in Cognitive Radar Game Modeling and Algorithm Research: A Review

Mode Selection and Target Classification in Cognitive Radar Networks

Dual-Function Radar-Communication System Aided by Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces

Cognitive Dynamic Systems: A Technical Review of Cognitive Radar

Deep Reinforcement Learning Control for Radar Detection and Tracking in Congested Spectral Environments

Deep multi-intentional inverse reinforcement learning for cognitive multi-function radar inverse cognition

Distributionally Robust Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Identifying Multi-Agent Coordinated Sensing

MIMO Radar Waveform-Filter Design for Extended Target Detection from a View of Games

A Dynamic Game Strategy for Radar Screening Pulsewidth Allocation Against Jamming Using Reinforcement Learning