Abstract:If time travel is possible, it seems to inevitably lead to paradoxes. These include consistency paradoxes, such as the famous grandfather paradox, and bootstrap paradoxes, where something is created out of nothing. One proposed class of resolutions to these paradoxes allows for multiple histories (or timelines), such that any changes to the past occur in a new history, independent of the one where the time traveler originated. We introduce a simple mathematical model for a spacetime with a time machine, and suggest two possible multiple-histories models, making use of branching spacetimes and covering spaces respectively. We use these models to construct novel and concrete examples of multiple-histories resolutions to time travel paradoxes, and we explore questions such as whether one can ever come back to a previously visited history and whether a finite or infinite number of histories is required. Interestingly, we find that the histories may be finite and cyclic under certain assumptions, in a way which extends the Novikov self-consistency conjecture to multiple histories and exhibits hybrid behavior combining the two. Investigating these cyclic histories, we rigorously determine how many histories are needed to fully resolve time travel paradoxes for particular laws of physics. Finally, we discuss how observers may experimentally distinguish between multiple histories and the Hawking and Novikov conjectures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the causal paradoxes that time travel may cause, especially those related to time machines. These paradoxes mainly include:
1. **Consistency Paradoxes**: For example, the well - known grandfather paradox, that is, a time traveler goes back in time and kills his own grandfather, thus causing himself to never be born and unable to travel through time. This kind of paradox involves the time traveler's actions leading to results inconsistent with the initial conditions.
2. **Bootstrap Paradoxes**: In this kind of paradox, certain information or objects only exist on closed time curves (CTCs) and seem to be created out of nothing. For example, a time traveler takes a novel back to the past and becomes the original author of this novel, which forms a closed loop without a clear origin.
To deal with these paradoxes, the paper proposes the Multiple Histories model, allowing time travelers to act on new histories instead of having an impact on their original histories. In this way, the paper attempts to provide a method to avoid these paradoxes while maintaining the consistency of physical laws.
### Specific Problems and Solutions
1. **Problem Description**:
- **Grandfather Paradox**: If a time traveler goes back in time and changes a key event (such as killing his own grandfather), it will lead to inconsistent changes in the future.
- **Bootstrap Paradox**: Certain information or objects form a closed loop on the timeline without a clear origin point.
2. **Solution**:
- **Multiple Histories Model**: The paper introduces two Multiple Histories models, namely the branching spacetime model and the covering space model. These two models allow time travelers to act on new histories, thus avoiding direct influence on the original history.
- **Branching Spacetime Model**: Every time a time traveler enters the time machine, he will enter a new historical branch, and can act freely in this branch without affecting the original history.
- **Covering Space Model**: By constructing a covering space, every time a time traveler enters the time machine, he will enter a new historical layer. These historical layers are independent of each other but share the same physical laws.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
1. **Constructing the Multiple Histories Model**: The paper details how to construct the branching spacetime model and the covering space model to solve the causal paradoxes in time travel.
2. **Specific Examples**: Through specific mathematical models and diagrams, it shows how the Multiple Histories model avoids the grandfather paradox and the bootstrap paradox.
3. **Theoretical Analysis**: It explores the Cyclic Histories problem in the Multiple Histories model, that is, under certain assumptions, history may be finite and cyclic, thus expanding the Novikov Self - Consistency Conjecture.
4. **Experimental Distinction**: It discusses how to distinguish the Multiple Histories model from other time - travel theories (such as Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture and Novikov's Self - Consistency Conjecture) through experimental methods.
In conclusion, by introducing the Multiple Histories model, this paper provides a new perspective to understand and solve the causal paradoxes in time travel, and provides an important reference for the theoretical research of time travel.