NICER observations of the Crab pulsar glitch of 2017 November

M. Vivekanand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936774
2019-11-22
Abstract:Context: The Crab pulsar underwent its largest timing glitch on 2017 Nov 8. The event was discovered at radio wavelengths, and was followed at soft X-ray energies by observatories, such as XPNAV and NICER. aims: This work aims to compare the glitch behavior at the two wavelengths mentioned above. Preliminary work in this regard has been done by the X-ray satellite XPNAV. NICER with its far superior sensitivity is expected to reveal much more detailed behavior. methods: NICER has accumulated more than $301$ kilo seconds of data on the Crab pulsar, equivalent to more than $3.3$ billion soft X-ray photons. These data were first processed using the standard NICER analysis pipeline. Then the arrival times of the X-ray photons were referred to the solar system's barycenter. Then specific analysis was done to study the specific behavior outlined in the following sections, while taking dead time into account. results: The variation of the rotation frequency of the Crab pulsar and its time derivative during the glitch is almost exactly similar at the radio and X-ray energies. The following properties of the Crab pulsar remain essentially constant before and after the glitch: the total X-ray flux; the flux, widths, and peaks of the two components of its integrated profile; and the soft X-ray spectrum. There is no evidence for giant pulses at X-ray energies. However, the timing noise of the Crab pulsar shows quasi sinusoidal variation before the glitch, with increasing amplitude, which is absent after the glitch. conclusions: Even the strongest glitch in the Crab pulsar appears not to affect all but one of the properties mentioned above, at either frequency. The fact that the timing noise appears to change due to the glitch is an important clue to unravel as this is still an unexplained phenomenon.
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to study the behavioral differences in the radio and soft X - ray bands of the largest glitch that occurred on November 8, 2017, in the Crab Nebula pulsar. Specifically, by comparing the data in these two bands, the paper explores the following questions: 1. **Changes in rotation frequency and its derivative**: - Are the changes in the pulsar's rotation frequency \( \nu \) and its time derivative \( \dot{\nu} \) during the glitch similar in the radio and soft X - ray bands? - What are the specific manifestations of these changes in the two bands? 2. **Pulse characteristics**: - Do the shapes, widths, and peaks of the main and secondary pulses of the pulsar change before and after the glitch? - Are there significant differences in these parameters between the radio and soft X - ray bands? 3. **X - ray flux**: - Does the glitch cause a change in the X - ray flux in the 2 - 50 keV energy range? - Are the flux changes in the radio and soft X - ray bands consistent? 4. **Spectral characteristics**: - Does the soft X - ray spectrum change significantly before and after the glitch? - Are these changes consistent with the observations in the radio band? 5. **Giant pulses**: - Does the Crab Nebula pulsar have the giant - pulse phenomenon in the soft X - ray band? - If so, what are the characteristics of these giant pulses? ### Research methods The paper uses a large amount of data collected by the Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) satellite. This data has high sensitivity and can reveal more detailed pulsar behavior. The specific steps include: - **Data processing**: Use the standard NICER analysis pipeline to process the data and convert the arrival times of X - ray photons to the barycenter of the solar system. - **Parameter estimation**: Estimate the period and period derivative of each observation ID through methods such as power - spectrum analysis and maximum - likelihood search. - **Pulse - characteristic analysis**: Align the data of different observation IDs by cross - correlation to estimate the average flux, width, and peak of the main and secondary pulses of the pulsar. - **Spectral - characteristic analysis**: Use the xspec tool to analyze the calibrated and uncalibrated soft X - ray spectra and compare the spectral characteristics before and after the glitch. - **Giant - pulse detection**: Detect whether there is a giant - pulse phenomenon in the soft X - ray band by analyzing photon events with a high count rate. ### Main conclusions - **Changes in rotation frequency and its derivative**: The changes in the rotation frequency \( \nu \) and its time derivative \( \dot{\nu} \) of the Crab Nebula pulsar during the glitch are almost identical in the radio and soft X - ray bands. - **Pulse characteristics**: Before and after the glitch, the shapes, widths, and peaks of the main and secondary pulses of the pulsar remain unchanged. - **X - ray flux**: The glitch does not cause a change in the X - ray flux in the 2 - 50 keV energy range. - **Spectral characteristics**: Before and after the glitch, the soft X - ray spectrum does not change significantly. - **Giant pulses**: There is no evidence to suggest the existence of the giant - pulse phenomenon in the soft X - ray band. ### Importance of the conclusions Although the glitch of the Crab Nebula pulsar is very strong, its impact on most observational parameters is very limited. This finding is of great significance for understanding the internal structure and dynamic processes of pulsars, especially the mechanisms of how glitches affect different physical properties of pulsars.