Abstract:I propose that the Change Laboratory is an underutilized intervention research methodology that can be used to foreground the voices, needs and rights of East Asian students taking English Medium Instruction classes predicated on the Western Socratic learning habitus. In particular, I relate the Change Laboratory methodology to a specific type of EMI pedagogy known as CLIL, Content Language Integrated Learning. What separates CLIL courses from content-based language learning and other forms of EMI, is the planned integration of the ‘4Cs’ of content, cognition, communication and culture into teaching and learning practice (Coyle et al., 2010). CLIL pedagogy aims to motivate and empower students in learner-centered classrooms. However, student voices have not often been foregrounded in research. The Change laboratory (Virkkunen and Newnham, 2013) is an intervention research methodology that can empower students with regard to course design. It applies a “Vygotskyan developmental approach in real-world, collective, organizational settings” (Bligh and Flood, 2015) and is therefore in accordance with CLIL pedagogy underpinned by the constructivist ideas of Bruner, Vygotsky and Piaget. There is much potential for the Change Laboratory to be used in course design as it focuses on how “institutional forms actually unfold locally” (Bligh and Flood, 2015) and has the ability to “develop the transformative agency of marginalized voices in higher education” (Bligh and Flood, 2015). Thus, I argue that Change Laboratory interventions can reduce linguistic imperialism, or perceptions thereof, in English Medium Instruction or CLIL settings in East Asia. They can help investigate the perception of cultural habitus – Confucian and Socratic – that may affect learning dispositions and in doing so redesign courses that better fit the needs of learners.

What's happening in traditional and inquiry-based introductory labs? An integrative analysis at a large research university

Inquiry-Based Teaching in the College Classroom: The Nontraditional Student

Iteration in an Inquiry-Based Undergraduate Laboratory Strengthens Student Engagement and Incorporation of Scientific Skills

Combining Inquiry-Based and Team-Teaching Models to Design a Research-Driven, Cross-Disciplinary Laboratory Course

Quantitative Comparisons to Promote Inquiry in the Introductory Physics Lab

Instructing nontraditional physics labs: Toward responsiveness to student epistemic framing

Problem-Based Approach to Teaching Advanced Chemistry Laboratories and Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills

Using a module-based laboratory to incorporate inquiry into a large cell biology course

Flipping Laboratories Toward Future Experimentation Systems: The Blended Use of Hands-On, Pocket, and Online Laboratories

An Investigative, Cooperative Learning Approach to the General Microbiology Laboratory

Developing skills vs reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from E-CLASS

Attending to experimental physics practices and lifelong learning skills in an introductory laboratory course

Building a Community of Practice: a Case Study of Introductory College Chemistry Students

Not engaging with problems in the lab: Students' navigation of conflicting data and models

The Change Laboratory in CLIL settings: Foregrounding the Voices of East Asian Students

Instructor listening during lecture: A case from introductory chemistry

What counts in laboratories: toward a practice-based identity survey

Designing Laboratories for Online Instruction Using the iOLab Device

Known Structure, Unknown Function: An Inquiry-based Undergraduate Biochemistry Laboratory Course

Transforming physics laboratory work from 'cookbook' type to genuine inquiry

Characterizing Discourse Group Roles in Inquiry-based University Science Labs