Reflection Phase Shift of One-dimensional Plasmon Polaritons in Carbon Nanotubes

Xingdong Luo,Cheng Hu,Bosai Lyu,Liu Yang,Xianliang Zhou,Aolin Deng,Ji-Hun Kang,Zhiwen Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041407

2019-12-27

Abstract:We investigated, both experimentally and theoretically, the reflection phase shift (RPS) of one-dimensional plasmon polaritons. We launched 1D plasmon polaritons in carbon nanotube and probed the plasmon interference pattern using scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM) technique, through which a non-zero phase shift was observed. We further developed a theory to understand the nonzero phase shift of 1D polaritons, and found that the RPS can be understood by considering the evanescent field beyond the nanotube end. Interesting, our theory shows a strong dependence of RPS on polaritons wavelength and nanotube diameter, which is in stark contrast to 2D plasmon polaritons in graphene where the RPS is a constant. In short wave region, the RPS of 1D polaritons only depends on a dimensionless variable -- the ratio between polaritons wavelength and nanotube diameter. These results provide fundamental insights into the reflection of polaritons in 1D system, and could facilitate the design of ultrasmall 1D polaritonic devices, such as resonators, interferometers.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the Reflection Phase Shift (RPS) of one - dimensional plasmon polaritons (1D plasmon polaritons) in carbon nanotubes. Specifically, the authors experimentally and theoretically studied the RPS of 1D plasmon polaritons and revealed its differences from two - dimensional (2D) plasmon polaritons.

### Main problems:
1. **Experimental measurement**: How to measure the reflection phase shift of 1D plasmon polaritons in carbon nanotubes in experiments.
2. **Theoretical explanation**: Why the RPS of 1D plasmon polaritons is different from that of 2D systems and depends on the plasmon polariton wavelength and the diameter of carbon nanotubes.
3. **Physical mechanism**: Whether the abnormal value of RPS (about 0.2π) can be attributed to the evanescent field near the end of carbon nanotubes.

### Research background:
- The plane - wave reflection phenomenon in the traditional three - dimensional dielectric environment can be well described by Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients.
- The emergence of low - dimensional materials (such as graphene, hexagonal boron nitride and carbon nanotubes) makes it possible to achieve high - quality plasmon polaritons in these materials, thus providing an opportunity to study RPS.
- The RPS of 2D plasmon polaritons (such as plasmons in graphene) has been studied and is usually close to 0.25π, which can be explained by the Goos - Hänchen phase shift.
- The RPS of 1D plasmon polaritons has not been fully studied.

### Experimental methods:
- Use scanning near - field optical microscope (s - SNOM) technology to excite and detect 1D plasmon polaritons in carbon nanotubes.
- Measure the plasmon polariton wavelength and reflection phase shift through near - field interference patterns.

### Theoretical model:
- Combine analytical calculations and COMSOL simulations to simulate the reflection phenomenon of 1D plasmon polaritons in carbon nanotubes.
- It is found that RPS is related to the evanescent field near the end of carbon nanotubes, similar to the situation in 2D graphene.
- In the short - wave region, RPS only depends on the ratio of the plasmon polariton wavelength to the diameter of carbon nanotubes (a dimensionless variable).

### Key findings:
- The RPS of 1D plasmon polaritons depends not only on the wavelength but also strongly on the diameter of carbon nanotubes, which is different from 2D plasmon polaritons.
- This dependence originates from the storage and reflection processes of electromagnetic energy near the end of carbon nanotubes.
- By analyzing the energy flow of the evanescent field, the relationship between RPS and the evanescent field is further verified.

### Significance:
These results provide a basis for the design and application of ultra - small devices based on 1D plasmons (such as resonators, interferometers), and are helpful for developing new ultra - sensitive sensors, heat concentrators in cancer treatment, basic units of metamaterials and active elements in all - optical signal processing.