Abstract:Purpose: The human voice is a powerful and evolved social tool, with hundreds of studies showing that nonverbal vocal parameters robustly influence listeners' perceptions of socially meaningful speaker traits, ranging from perceived gender and age to attractiveness and trustworthiness. However, these studies have utilized a wide variety of voice stimuli to measure listeners' voice-based judgments of these traits. Here, in the largest scale study known to date, we test whether listeners judge the same unseen speakers differently depending on the complexity of the neutral speech stimulus, from single vowel sounds to a full paragraph. Method: In a playback experiment testing 2,618 listeners, we examine whether commonly studied voice-based judgments of attractiveness, trustworthiness, dominance, likability, femininity/masculinity, and health differ if listeners hear isolated vowels, a series of vowels, single words, single sentences (greeting), counting from 1 to 10, or a full paragraph recited aloud (Rainbow Passage), recorded from the same 208 men and women. Data were collected using a custom-designed interface in which vocalizers and traits were randomly assigned to raters. Results: Linear-mixed models show that the type of voice stimulus does indeed consistently affect listeners' judgments. Overall, ratings of attractiveness, trustworthiness, dominance, likability, health, masculinity among men, and femininity among women increase as speech duration increases. At the same time, speaker-level regression analyses show that interindividual differences in perceived speaker traits are largely preserved across voice stimuli, especially among those of a similar duration. Conclusions: Socially relevant perceptions of speakers are not wholly changed but rather moderated by the length of their speech. Indeed, the same vocalizer is perceived in a similar way regardless of which neutral statements they speak, with the caveat that longer utterances explain the most shared variance in listeners' judgments and elicit the highest ratings on all traits, possibly by providing additional nonverbal information to listeners. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21158890

Sounds too feminine? Blind tastings, phonetic gender scores, and the impact on professional critics

Can a wine be feminine? Gendered wine descriptors and quality, price, and aging potential

Factors explaining differences in wine experts' ratings: The case of gender, credentials, occupation and peer effects

Wine, Women, Men, and Type II Error*

Does Blind Tasting Work? Investigating the Impact of Training on Blind Tasting Accuracy and Wine Preference

The language of wine reviews

The nose knows: influence of colour on perception of wine aroma

Auditory perceptual assessment of voices: Examining perceptual ratings as a function of voice experience

Willingness to pay for female-made wine: Evidence from an online experiment

Music and wine tasting: an experimental neuromarketing study

Factors influencing wine ratings in an online wine community: The case of Trentino–Alto Adige

Typical Vine or International Taste: Wine Consumers' Dilemma Between Beliefs and Preferences

Perception of Femininity and Masculinity in Voices as Rated by Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Professional Speech and Language Pathologists, and Cisgender Naive Listeners

More hawthorn and less dried longan: the role of information and taste on red wine consumer preferences in China

Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices

Reviewer Preferences and Gender Disparities in Aesthetic Judgments

Looking behind eye-catching design: an eye-tracking study on wine bottle design preference

Auditory-Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis of Gender Expression in the Voice

Do Voice-Based Judgments of Socially Relevant Speaker Traits Differ Across Speech Types?

Wine ratings and commercial reality

Decoding the Identity of Pinot Gris and Pinot Noir Wines: A Comprehensive Chemometric Fusion of Sensory (from Dual Panel) and Chemical Analysis