Abstract:The CHSH inequality is an inequality used to test locality in quantum theory and is recognized as one of Bell's inequalities. In contrast, the KCBS inequality is employed to test noncontextuality in quantum theory. While certain quantum states are known to violate these inequalities individually, it was previously assumed that no state could violate both inequalities simultaneously. This assumption is encapsulated in the concept of the `monogamy relation.' It describes a trade-off between nonlocality and contextuality: the violation of one inequality typically excludes the possibility of violating the other. However, Xue et al. demonstrated that simultaneous violations of both the CHSH and KCBS inequalities are possible with specific choices of observables. This discovery challenges the universal validity of the monogamy relation. It also suggests that the relationship between contextuality and nonlocality is more complex than previously understood. They further showed that numerous scenarios exist where both the CHSH inequality and a contextuality inequality involving more than five observables are violated. However, the number of such scenarios is finite. Building on this, we present two main results. The first is that there are infinitely many scenarios in which both the CHSH inequality and a contextuality inequality involving an odd number of observables are violated. This finding reveals the existence of infinitely many scenarios where the monogamy relation between the CHSH inequality and the noncontextuality inequality no longer holds. The second is that certain quantum states violate both the KCBS inequality and a nonlocality inequality distinct from the CHSH inequality. These insights deepen our understanding of the complex relationship between nonlocality and contextuality, and open avenues for exploring state-dependent inequalities and their physical implications.

The problem of quantum correlations and the totalitarian principle

Kolmogorovian Censorship, Predictive Incompleteness, and the locality loophole in Bell experiments

Quantum Correlations are Tightly Bound by the Exclusivity Principle

The quantum maxima for the basic graphs of exclusivity are not reachable in Bell scenarios

States Violating Both Locality and Noncontextuality Inequalities in Quantum Theory

Why quantum correlations are shocking

Generalized Bell scenarios: disturbing consequences on local-hidden-variable models

Does Quantum Mechanics Require "Conspiracy"?

Quantum violation of the Suppes-Zanotti inequalities and "contextuality"

Correlations constrained by composite measurements

Violating the KCBS inequality with a toy mechanism

Experimental Test of Quantum Nonlocality from Contextuality

Experimental Test of High-Dimensional Quantum Contextuality Based on Contextuality Concentration

Bounding and Simulating Contextual Correlations in Quantum Theory

On modifications of Reichenbach's principle of common cause in light of Bell's theorem

EPR Paradox,Locality and Completeness of Quantum Theory

Corrected Bell and non-contextuality inequalities for realistic experiments

Bound on Genuine Multipartite Correlations from the Principle of Information Causality

Tsirelson bounds for quantum correlations with indefinite causal order

Bosonic fields in states with undefined particle numbers possess detectable non-contextuality features, plus more