Abstract:This article proposes quantitative answers to meta-scientific questions including 'how much knowledge is attained by a research field?', 'how rapidly is a field making progress?', 'what is the expected reproducibility of a result?', 'how much knowledge is lost from scientific bias and misconduct?', 'what do we mean by soft science?', and 'what demarcates a pseudoscience?'. Knowledge is suggested to be a system-specific property measured by K, a quantity determined by how much of the information contained in an explanandum is compressed by an explanans, which is composed of an information 'input' and a 'theory/methodology' conditioning factor. This approach is justified on three grounds: (i) K is derived from postulating that information is finite and knowledge is information compression; (ii) K is compatible and convertible to ordinary measures of effect size and algorithmic complexity; (iii) K is physically interpretable as a measure of entropic efficiency. Moreover, the K function has useful properties that support its potential as a measure of knowledge. Examples given to illustrate the possible uses of K include: the knowledge value of proving Fermat's last theorem; the accuracy of measurements of the mass of the electron; the half life of predictions of solar eclipses; the usefulness of evolutionary models of reproductive skew; the significance of gender differences in personality; the sources of irreproducibility in psychology; the impact of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices; the knowledge value of astrology. Furthermore, measures derived from K may complement ordinary meta-analysis and may give rise to a universal classification of sciences and pseudosciences. Simple and memorable mathematical formulae that summarize the theory's key results may find practical uses in meta-research, philosophy and research policy.

The balance of knowledge flows

A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge

Analyzing the inter-domain vs intra-domain knowledge flows

The domestic localization of knowledge flows as evidenced by publication citation: The case of Italy

Who benefits from a country's scientific research?

Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Gaps, and Knowledge Silos in Citation Networks

return Can the KnowledgeBase of an Economy Be Measured ? 1 *

Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science

A new approach to measure the scientific strengths of territories

From Books to Knowledge Graphs

Science Mapping to study academic knowledge circulation

Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification

Study on the Measurement of International Knowledge Flow Based on the Patent Citation Network.

Exploring the Disproportion Between Scientific Productivity and Knowledge Amount

National Systems of Innovation , the Triple Helix : Can the KnowledgeBase of an Economy be Measured ?

Knowledge Flow,Knowledge Distribution Force and Science Communication in Basic Research

How science maps reveal knowledge transfer: new measurement for a historical case

A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university-industry research collaborations

Quantifying knowledge exchange in R&D networks: A data-driven model

Looking Back to Move Forward: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaboration

Quantifying knowledge from the perspective of information structurization