Abstract:The phase field paradigm, in combination with a suitable variational structure, has opened a path for using Griffith’s energy balance to predict the fracture of solids. These so-called phase field fracture methods have gained significant popularity over the past decade, and are now part of commercial finite element packages and engineering fitness- for-service assessments. Crack paths can be predicted, in arbitrary geometries and dimensions, based on a global energy minimization—without the need for ad hoc criteria. In this work, we review the fundamentals of phase field fracture methods and examine their capabilities in delivering predictions in agreement with the classical fracture mechanics theory pioneered by Griffith. The two most widely used phase field fracture models are implemented in the context of the finite element method, and several paradigmatic boundary value problems are addressed to gain insight into their predictive abilities across all cracking stages; both the initiation of growth and stable crack propagation are investigated. In addition, we examine the effectiveness of phase field models with an internal material length scale in capturing size effects and the transition flaw size concept. Our results show that phase field fracture methods satisfactorily approximate classical fracture mechanics predictions and can also reconcile stress and toughness criteria for fracture. The accuracy of the approximation is however dependent on modelling and constitutive choices; we provide a rationale for these differences and identify suitable approaches for delivering phase field fracture predictions that are in good agreement with well-established fracture mechanics paradigms. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘A cracking approach to inventing new tough materials: fracture stranger than friction’.

Phase-Field Modelling of Interface Failure in Brittle Materials

Phase-Field Modeling of Crack Branching and Deflection in Heterogeneous Media

A Length-Free Phase Field Model for Epoxy Adhesive Materials Based on Modified Drucker–Prager Criterion

Phase-field modeling of fracture in heterogeneous materials -- jump conditions, convergence and crack propagation

Phase-Field Modelling of Damage and Fracture—Convergence and Local Mesh Refinement

A mixed-mode dependent interface and phase-field damage model for solids with inhomogeneities

A Phase-Field Framework for Modeling Multiple Cohesive Fracture Behaviors in Laminated Composite Materials

A modified phase-field model for cohesive interface failure in quasi-brittle solids

Phase field modeling of hyperelastic material interfaces –Theory, implementation and application to phase transformations

A phase‐field method for modeling cracks with frictional contact

An assessment of phase field fracture: crack initiation and growth

Multi-phase-field approach to fracture demonstrating the role of solid-solid interface energy on crack propagation

A phase-field model for fracture in biological tissues

Phase field modeling of dynamic fracture in elastoplastic composites with interfacial debonding

Fracture of Soft Materials with Interfaces: Phase Field Modeling Based on Hybrid ES-FEM/FEM

Comparative analysis of phase-field and intrinsic cohesive zone models for fracture simulations in multiphase materials with interfaces: Investigation of the influence of the microstructure on the fracture properties

Phase field simulation of fatigue crack propagation under complex load situations

Internal-interfacial cracking interaction: Combined phase-field and discontinuous Galerkin/cohesive zone modeling

A Study on Phase-Field Models for Brittle Fracture

Modeling Microfracture Evolution in Heterogeneous Composites: A Coupled Cohesive Phase-Field Model

A unified phase-field method-based framework for modeling quasi-brittle fracture in composites with interfacial debonding