Abstract:Current static verification techniques support a wide range of programs. However, such techniques only support complete and detailed specifications, which places an undue burden on users. To solve this problem, prior work proposed gradual verification, which handles complete, partial, or missing specifications by soundly combining static and dynamic checking. Gradual verification has also been extended to programs that manipulate recursive, mutable data structures on the heap. Unfortunately, this extension does not reward users with decreased dynamic checking as specifications are refined. In fact, all properties are checked dynamically regardless of any static guarantees. Additionally, no full-fledged implementation of gradual verification exists so far, which prevents studying its performance and applicability in practice. We present Gradual C0, the first practicable gradual verifier for recursive heap data structures, which targets C0, a safe subset of C designed for education. Static verifiers supporting separation logic or implicit dynamic frames use symbolic execution for reasoning; so Gradual C0, which extends one such verifier, adopts symbolic execution at its core instead of the weakest liberal precondition approach used in prior work. Our approach addresses technical challenges related to symbolic execution with imprecise specifications, heap ownership, and branching in both program statements and specification formulas. We also deal with challenges related to minimizing insertion of dynamic checks and extensibility to other programming languages beyond C0. Finally, we provide the first empirical performance evaluation of a gradual verifier, and found that on average, Gradual C0 decreases run-time overhead between 11-34% compared to the fully-dynamic approach used in prior work. Further, the worst-case scenarios for performance are predictable and avoidable.

Towards Gradual Checking of Reference Capabilities

Reference Capabilities for Safe Parallel Array Programming

Securing c programs by dynamic type checking

Approximate Normalization and Eager Equality Checking for Gradual Inductive Families

Gradual Typing for Effect Handlers

Reasoning about Interior Mutability in Rust using Library-Defined Capabilities

Reference Capabilities for Flexible Memory Management: Extended Version

Gradual Sensitivity Typing

Gradual Program Analysis for Null Pointers

Escape with Your Self: A Solution to the Avoidance Problem with Decidable Bidirectional Typing for Reachability Types

Graduality from Embedding-projection Pairs (Extended Version)

Gradual Typing for Extensibility by Rows

Denotational Semantics of Gradual Typing using Synthetic Guarded Domain Theory (Extended Version)

Avoiding Grave Interference In Boca

Gradual Typing in an Open World

Guard Analysis and Safe Erasure Gradual Typing: a Type System for Elixir

Quest Complete: the Holy Grail of Gradual Security

Uninitialized Capabilities

Gradual C0: Symbolic Execution for Gradual Verification

Static Blame for gradual typing

C to checked C by 3c