Abstract:With a wide array of multi-modal, multi-protocol, and multi-scale biomedical data available for disease diagnosis and prognosis, there is a need for quantitative tools to combine such varied channels of information, especially imaging and non-imaging data (e.g. spectroscopy, proteomics). The major problem in such quantitative data integration lies in reconciling the large spread in the range of dimensionalities and scales across the different modalities. The primary goal of quantitative data integration is to build combined meta-classifiers; however these efforts are thwarted by challenges in (1) homogeneous representation of the data channels, (2) fusing the attributes to construct an integrated feature vector, and (3) the choice of learning strategy for training the integrated classifier. In this paper, we seek to (a) define the characteristics that guide the 4 independent methods for quantitative data fusion that use the idea of a meta-space for building integrated multi-modal, multi-scale meta-classifiers, and (b) attempt to understand the key components which allowed each method to succeed. These methods include (1) Generalized Embedding Concatenation (GEC), (2) Consensus Embedding (CE), (3) Semi-Supervised Multi-Kernel Graph Embedding (SeSMiK), and (4) Boosted Embedding Combination (BEC). In order to evaluate the optimal scheme for fusing imaging and non-imaging data, we compared these 4 schemes for the problems of combining (a) multi-parametric MRI with spectroscopy for prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis in vivo, and (b) histological image with proteomic signatures (obtained via mass spectrometry) for predicting prognosis in CaP patients. The kernel combination approach (SeSMiK) marginally outperformed the embedding combination schemes. Additionally, intelligent weighting of the data channels (based on their relative importance) appeared to outperform unweighted strategies. All 4 strategies easily outperformed a naïve decision fusion approach, suggesting that data integration methods will play an important role in the rapidly emerging field of integrated diagnostics and personalized healthcare.

Fusing heterogeneous data sets

Statistical Single Cell Multi-Omics Integration

Clustering by Heterogeneous Data Fusion : Framework and Applications

Integrating Heterogeneous Genomic Data to Accurately Identify Disease Subtypes

Multi-source heterogeneous data fusion

Scalable data fusion via a scale-based hierarchical framework: Adapting to multi-source and multi-scale scenarios

B-scaling: A Novel Nonparametric Data Fusion Method

A Graphical Model for Fusing Diverse Microbiome Data

Integration of Various 'Omics' Data in Biological Systems

Data Fusion in Heterogeneous Networks

A unified framework for the integration of multiple hierarchical clusterings or networks from multi-source data

Robust structured heterogeneity analysis approach for high-dimensional data

MULTI-MODAL DATA FUSION SCHEMES FOR INTEGRATED CLASSIFICATION OF IMAGING AND NON-IMAGING BIOMEDICAL DATA

Systems Heterogeneity: an Integrative Way to Understand Cancer Heterogeneity.

DeFusion: a denoised network regularization framework for multi-omics integration

A hierarchical fusion framework to integrate homogeneous and heterogeneous classifiers for medical decision-making

In silico microdissection of microarray data from heterogeneous cell populations

Benchmarking strategies for cross-species integration of single-cell RNA sequencing data

Integrating diverse genomic data using gene sets

Similarity Fusion Via Exploiting High Order Proximity for Cancer Subtyping.

Distance-function design and fusion for sequence data.