Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC-MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept
João Brinco,Raquel Carvalho,Marco D. R. Gomes da Silva,Paula Guedes,Alexandra B. Ribeiro,Eduardo Mateus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4820909
IF: 4.601
2024-08-31
Journal of Chromatography A
Abstract:A new method was evaluated and developed for the analysis of pesticides in sandy-loam soil by direct-immersion solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) followed by gas chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) determination. Ten pesticides were selected based on a literature survey of the compounds reported to be present in EU soils. The extraction was performed using SPME LC-Tips, a new SPME configuration with the coated fibers attached to a disposable and easy-to-handle micropipette tip, which was immersed into a soil slurry made by the addition of an aqueous solution to the soil sample. Ten experimental parameters were evaluated with a Plackett-Burman design, after which the extraction time and percentage of organic solvent in the aqueous extraction were optimized separately. The two fiber chemistries available (PDMS/DVB and C 18 ) were evaluated in parallel for the entire work. In the final method, slurry samples were made by adding an aqueous solution (6% methanol v/v) to 2 g of soil. The fiber was conditioned and then inserted, for extraction, into the samples, stirred by a magnetic bar. Afterwards, the analytes were desorbed onto 100 μ L of methanol. After the addition of analyte protectants (ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol) the extract was injected into the GC-MS/MS system. Isotopically labelled penconazole was used as internal standard. A calibration was performed by extracting spiked soil with analyte concentrations of 0.1-50 μg/kg. Coefficients of determination of the linear calibration were between 0.94-0.98 for the PDMS/DVB and 0.92-0.99 for the C 18 . Limits of detection range between 0.01-10 μg/kg for the PDMS/DVB and 0.1-10 μg/kg for the C 18 . Overall, the C 18 analytically outperformed the PDMS/DVB but required a longer extraction time (120 min vs 75 min for the PDMS/DVB). This method allows automation and generates low residual toxic waste, having the potential to be introduced as a greener and simpler alternative to currently used sample preparation methodologies.
chemistry, analytical,biochemical research methods