Abstract:In recent years, there has been increasing interest in causal reasoning for designing fair decision-making systems due to its compatibility with legal frameworks, interpretability for human stakeholders, and robustness to spurious correlations inherent in observational data, among other factors. The recent attention to causal fairness, however, has been accompanied with great skepticism due to practical and epistemological challenges with applying current causal fairness approaches in the literature. Motivated by the long-standing empirical work on causality in econometrics, social sciences, and biomedical sciences, in this paper we lay out the conditions for appropriate application of causal fairness under the "potential outcomes framework." We highlight key aspects of causal inference that are often ignored in the causal fairness literature. In particular, we discuss the importance of specifying the nature and timing of interventions on social categories such as race or gender. Precisely, instead of postulating an intervention on immutable attributes, we propose a shift in focus to their perceptions and discuss the implications for fairness evaluation. We argue that such conceptualization of the intervention is key in evaluating the validity of causal assumptions and conducting sound causal analysis including avoiding post-treatment bias. Subsequently, we illustrate how causality can address the limitations of existing fairness metrics, including those that depend upon statistical correlations. Specifically, we introduce causal variants of common statistical notions of fairness, and we make a novel observation that under the causal framework there is no fundamental disagreement between different notions of fairness. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments where we demonstrate our approach for evaluating and mitigating unfairness, specially when post-treatment variables are present.

A Causal Bayesian Networks Viewpoint on Fairness

Causal Fairness-Guided Dataset Reweighting using Neural Networks

When Causality Meets Fairness: A Survey

Causal Context Connects Counterfactual Fairness to Robust Prediction and Group Fairness

Causal Discovery for Fairness

Causal Interventions for Fairness

Explaining Algorithmic Fairness Through Fairness-Aware Causal Path Decomposition

Data Management for Causal Algorithmic Fairness

Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective

Interventional Fairness on Partially Known Causal Graphs: A Constrained Optimization Approach

Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning

Fair Inference for Discrete Latent Variable Models

Counterfactual Fair Opportunity: Measuring Decision Model Fairness with Counterfactual Reasoning

Causal Fairness under Unobserved Confounding: A Neural Sensitivity Framework

Mitigating bias in artificial intelligence: Fair data generation via causal models for transparent and explainable decision-making

Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks.

Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach

The Fragility of Fairness: Causal Sensitivity Analysis for Fair Machine Learning

Causal Discovery and Causal Inference Based Counterfactual Fairness in Machine Learning

Fair Risk Minimization under Causal Path-Specific Effect Constraints

What Is Fairness? On the Role of Protected Attributes and Fictitious Worlds