Abstract:Although everything brought by driverless technology is full of attractiveness, until the related technologies and laws are perfected, human-machine shared control is still the best choice at present. There are two main methods in the current shared control strategy. One is that the assisted driving system guides the driver to control the vehicle through voice or tactile. This method cannot guarantee the effectiveness of the assist function when the driver is not attentive. The second is to take over the vehicle based on the risk assessment algorithm by monitoring the vehicle’s dynamic state and the surrounding environment. This method can improve the safety of the vehicle, but its comfort is poor. This paper studies the real-time identification method of driver’s intention, by constructing the steering angle envelope based on the planned trajectory, establishes a flexible control transfer mechanism, through trajectory switching within the kinematic envelope, the human-machine shared control for trajectory following is realized. Firstly, a series of safety trajectories are obtained by constructing a safe envelope for vehicle kinematics. Then, by using the decoupling characteristics of the steer-by-wire system, the driver’s intention recognition algorithm is established by constructing the accuracy envelope of the steering wheel angle, and a trajectory that meets the driver’s intention is selected to ensure the driver’s confidence. Finally, the path tracking controller using a linear time-varying model prediction algorithm will control the vehicle to follow the trajectory determined by the driver. In this way, unlike driverless technology or some other assisted driving systems, by constructing a flexible transfer mechanism of control rights based on the steering angle envelope, although sacrificing driver expectations within a certain range, not only can the steering wheel shake be filtered to ensure driving comfort, but also the accuracy of trajectory tracking can be improved.

Controllable Planning, Responsibility, and Information in Automatic Driving Technology

The Controllability of Planning, Responsibility, and Security in Automatic Driving Technology

Not in Control, but Liable? Attributing Human Responsibility for Fully Automated Vehicle Accidents

Human and machine drivers: Sharing control, sharing responsibility

Shared control versus traded control in driving: a debate around automation pitfalls

Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles

Analysis of Key Issues on Man-Control to System-Control Leap in Autonomous Driving

Autonomous Driving Safety Challenge:Behavior Decision-Making and Motion Planning

The Human Factors of the Take-over Process in Conditional Automated Driving Based on Cognitive Mechanism

A comparative study of state-of-the-art driving strategies for autonomous vehicles

Overview of Tools Supporting Planning for Automated Driving

Decision-Making in Driver-Automation Shared Control: A Review and Perspectives

Law compliance decision making for autonomous vehicles on highways

Accident Liability Determination of Autonomous Driving Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology and Its Impact on Public Mental Health

Reflections on Automation Complacency

Evaluation and Control Model Design of Human Factors for Autonomous Driving Systems

Take-Over of Control in Highly Automated Vehicles: A Literature Review

When both human and machine drivers make mistakes: Whom to blame?

The Dilemma Generated by Automated Driving Considered from Ethical Aspect

Shared Control Strategy Based on Driver’s Trajectory Following Intention

Developing Robot Driver Etiquette Based on Naturalistic Human Driving Behavior