Preoperative Assessment of Craniopharyngioma Adherence: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings Correlated with the Severity of Tumor Attachment to the Hypothalamus.

R. Prieto,J. Pascual,M. Rosdolsky,L. Barrios

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.012

IF: 2.21

2017-11-01

World Neurosurgery

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of medial meniscus lesion in anterior cruciate ligament--deficient knees: results of second-look arthroscopies in 39 cases

Jin Hwan Ahn,Joon Ho Wang,Jae Chul Yoo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.038

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate by second-look arthroscopy the clinical results of arthroscopic all-inside sutures with hook using 2 posteromedial portals for medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) tears in patients who underwent concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Type of study: Case series. Methods: From May 1997 to June 2001, 78 knees underwent surgery for MMPH tears with arthroscopic all-inside sutures with hook and concurrent ACL reconstruction. Among them, 39 patients were evaluated with follow-up second-look arthroscopy. All MMPH tears were repaired by arthroscopic all-inside suture technique using 2 posteromedial portals. The second-look arthroscopy was performed, on average, 19 months (range, 6 to 40 months) after the ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair. They were divided into complete healing, incomplete healing, and failure groups. Tear size, type, and location were analyzed. We determined clinical criteria for success in meniscal status as (1) not positive for 4 clinical objective parameters--joint line pain and tenderness, locking or catching, recurrent effusions, and McMurray test; and (2) complete healing of all-inside sutured meniscus during second-look arthroscopy. Results: Among 39 knees assessed by second-look arthroscopy, 32 (82.1%) knees showed complete healing and 6 (15.4%) showed incomplete healing without any positive findings of the clinical symptoms. Furthermore, all cases in the incompletely healed group had complete healing of the posterior horn, which was sutured by an all-inside suture; the incomplete healing was observed between the junction areas of all-inside to inside-out sutures, which was mainly at the posteromedial corner. The success rate was 97.4% (38 of 39 patients) overall for all-inside suture healing. The 1 patient (2.6%) with clinical failure had a retear of the repaired site. The average knee scores improved and all showed less than 2-mm side-to-side difference on KT-2000 testing. Conclusions: Arthroscopic all-inside vertical suture using a suture hook resulted in a high rate of healing even in large and complex vertical tears. This suturing can be one of the optimal treatments for MMPH tears greater than 1 cm during concurrent ACL reconstruction. Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study, Cases Series (no, or historical, control group).
Good mid- to long-term outcomes after meniscus bucket-handle tear repair: A comparative analysis with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Johannes Pawelczyk,Ilias Fanourgiakis,Sven Feil,Maja Siebold,Ioannis Kougioumtzis,Rainer Siebold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12093

2024-07-15

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate mid- to long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) repair and to assess the impact of concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: A comparative retrospective case series with blinded outcome assessment was conducted. All consecutive patients treated with arthroscopic BHMT repair with or without concurrent ACLR between 2001 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Fifty-five patients with an average follow-up of 7.3 ± 3.4 years were included in the analysis. Outcome measures comprised post-operative IKDC Subjective Knee Form, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale, KOOS, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction. Additionally, failure and reoperation rates were assessed. Results: The failure rate was 9%. Medial BHMT repair showed superior post-operative IKDC scores compared to lateral meniscus repair (p = 0.038). Concurrent ACLR did not demonstrate any impact on post-operative KOOS, IKDC, Tegner or patient satisfaction. The mean IKDC score at final follow-up across both groups was 80.4 ± 17.8. The mean Lysholm score was 86.9 ± 16.7. Mean KOOS scores were (i) symptoms: 83.6 ± 18.3, (ii) pain: 90.2 ± 14.4, (iii) activities of daily living: 93.6 ± 15.1, (iv) sports: 78.3 ± 26.0 and (v) quality of life: 70.5 ± 24.5. Mean patient satisfaction (VAS) was 7.9 ± 2.5. The mean Tegner score was 4.9 ± 1.9. A consistent positive correlation between the number of sutures used and post-operative outcome measures was observed but did not reach statistical significance for most items. Conclusion: Arthroscopic BHMT repair achieved good clinical outcomes and an acceptable failure rate of 9% at a mean follow-up of 7 years, supporting the clinical value of meniscal repair, including large BHMTs. Concurrent ACLR showed no impact on clinical outcomes. Level of evidence: Level IV (retrospective case series).
Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes of meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of suture and meniscus fixation device

Seung-Suk Seo,Chang-Wan Kim,Chang-Rack Lee,Dae-Hyun Park,Yong-Uk Kwon,Ok-Gul Kim,Chang-Kyu Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03323-3

IF: 2.928

2019-12-14

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Abstract:IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing rate of repaired meniscus and functional outcomes of patients who received all-inside meniscal repair using sutures or devices with concomitant arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Materials and methodsAmong the patients who have ACL tear and posterior horn tear of medial or lateral meniscus, 61 knees who received all-inside repair using sutures (suture group, n = 28) or meniscal fixation devices (device group, n = 33) with concomitant ACL reconstruction during the period from January 2012 to December 2015, followed by second-look arthroscopy, were retrospectively reviewed. Healing status of the repair site was assessed by second-look arthroscopy. Through the clinical assessment, clinical success (negative medial joint line tenderness, no history of locking or recurrent effusion, and negative McMurray test) rate of the repaired meniscus and functional outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated.ResultsIn a comparison of healing status of repaired meniscus evaluated by second-look arthroscopy, suture group had 23 cases of complete healing (82.1%), 4 cases of incomplete healing (14.3%), and 1 case of failure (3.6%). Device group had 18 cases of complete healing (54.5%), 4 cases of incomplete healing (24.2%), and 7 cases of failure (21.2%) (p = 0.048). Clinical success rate of the meniscal repair was 89.3% (25 cases) and 81.8% (27 cases) in suture group and device group, respectively (p = 0.488). No significant difference of functional outcomes was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05, both parameters).ConclusionsAmong the patients who received meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction, suture group showed better healing status of repaired meniscus based on the second-look arthroscopy than device group. However, no significant between-group difference of clinical success rate and functional outcomes was observed.

surgery,orthopedics
Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction

Gregory T Perraut,Rachel E Cherelstein,Alexandra M Galel,Laura E Keeling,Christopher M Kuenze,Andrew J Curley,David X Wang,Kaitlin A Malekzadeh,Edward S Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70004

2024-08-28

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine demographic and surgical factors that influence patient-reported knee function in patients who undergo anterior crucial ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with concurrent bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) procedures. We hypothesized that repair of BHMT in the setting of concomitant ACLR and shorter time from injury to surgery would lead to improved patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Forty-one patients (mean age: 28.0 ± 9.8 years, 72% male) with BHMT at the time of ACLR completed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) via online survey at an average of 15.2 months postop. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics, including time from injury to surgery, were compared between repair (n = 22) and meniscectomy (n = 19) groups using one-way analysis of variances; distributions of sex, graft source, BHMT compartment and zone were compared between groups using χ 2 tests. The association between IKDC-SKF score, demographics and surgical characteristics was evaluated using multivariable linear regression. A priori alpha level was p < 0.05. Results: Meniscal repair and meniscectomy groups differed based on graft source and BHMT zone but not IKDC-SKF score (p = 0.085). Patients undergoing ACLR with autograft (p = 0.003) and with red-red zone BHMT (p < 0.001) more often underwent meniscal repair. The regression model demonstrated longer time from injury to surgery (p = 0.049), red-red tear zone (p = 0.04) and meniscectomy (p = 0.008); these were predictive of poorer IKDC-SKF scores. Conclusion: BHMT repair was more likely performed in ACL autograft and on red-red zone tears. Longer time from injury to surgery is an indicator of poorer IKDC-SKF score, as this may increase the risk of concomitant pathologies. White-white zone BHMTs are associated with better IKDC-SKF scores than red-red zone BHMTs, which may be due to the smaller volume of tissue removed during meniscectomy of white-white zone tears and the avoidance of iatrogenic complications of meniscal repair. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.
Ureaplasma urealyticum destructive septic arthritis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus after rituximab therapy.

T. Goulenok,S. Bialek,Sandrine Gaudart,C. Bébéar,B. Fantin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.11.010

2011-05-01

Abstract:
Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Healing Rates After Arthroscopic Repair of Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Wenli Dai,Xi Leng,Jian Wang,Xiaoqing Hu,Yingfang Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211038289

2021-10-22

Abstract:Background: Evaluation of meniscal healing status after repair is important, as it allows the surgeon to inform patients whether they can increase their activities or return to sports. Purpose: To identify the healing rates after arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears via second-look arthroscopic evaluation. Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases were conducted to identify relevant studies published before June 1, 2020. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they provided data regarding healing status of the meniscus at second-look arthroscopy. Random-effects meta-analyses were generated to provide pooled meniscal healing estimates. We further performed subgroup analysis to investigate the healing rates of the meniscus under different situations. Results: A total of 41 studies with 1908 individuals were included in the study. The pooled analysis showed the complete healing rate was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-80%), the partial healing rate was 10% (95% CI, 6%-16%), and the failure rate was 12% (95% CI, 10%-15%) for arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears via second-look arthroscopic evaluation. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that no individual study affected the overall healing rate by >1%. Subgroup analysis found higher meniscal healing rates in patients with the following characteristics: age <40 years, male, body mass index <26, red-red tear location, tear in posterior horn, vertical tear, outside-in technique, repair concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, weight-restricted rehabilitation, and time interval from meniscal repair to second-look arthroscopy >12 months. Conclusion: In this systematic review, the complete healing rate was 74%, the partial healing rate was 10%, and the failure rate was 12% for arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears via second-look arthroscopic evaluation.
Meniscus Repair with Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes, Failure Rates and Subsequent Processing.

Yu-Ping Yang,Xiao Ma,Hua An,Xiao-Peng Liu,Ning An,Ying-Fang Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.09.005

2022-01-01

Chinese Journal of Traumatology

Abstract:PurposeTo retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and explore the causes of failure of meniscus repair.MethodsFrom May 2013 to July 2018, the clinical data of 165 patients who were treated with meniscus surgery and simultaneous ACL reconstruction, including 69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ACL rupture associated with fracture, collateral ligament injury, or complex ligament injury; (2) a history of knee surgery; or (3) a significant degree of osteoarthritis. The 69 patients in the repair group were divided into the non-failure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect. Postoperative outcomes of the repair group and the partial meniscectomy group were compared. General conditions and postoperative outcomes of the failure group and the non-failure group were compared. During the median follow-up period of 28 months (range, 4 - 65 months) after the second arthroscopy, postoperative outcomes of seven patients in the failure group were summarized. SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSeven patients in the failure group who underwent the second arthroscopy were followed up for (30 ± 17.4) months and their postoperative outcomes were summarized. Compared with the partial meniscectomy group, the International Knee Documentation Committee scores of patients in the repair group improved significantly (p = 0.031). Compared with the non-failure group, more patients in the failure group were younger than 24 years (p = 0.030). The median follow-up period was 39.5 months. All patients recovered well after subsequent partial meniscectomy and relieved clinical symptoms. Visual analog scale scores decreased significantly (p = 0.026), and the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores improved significantly (p = 0.046 for both).ConclusionThe failure rate of meniscus repair in this study was 10.1% (7/69), all of which were medial meniscus tears. However, the surgical outcomes of ACL reconstruction were not affected, and there might be a role for graft protection. Therefore, meniscus retears can be successful treated by performing subsequent partial meniscectomy in patients with repair failure.
Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study

James R Robinson,David Bruce,Hywel Davies,Andrew J Porteous,James R D Murray,Nick R Howells

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2021-1340.R2

Abstract:Aims: The best surgical strategy for the management of displaced bucket-handle (BH) meniscal tears in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is unclear. Combining meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is thought to improve meniscal healing rates; however, patients with displaced BH meniscal tears may lack extension. This leads some to advocate staged surgery to avoid postoperative stiffness and loss of range of motion (ROM) following ACLR. Methods: We reviewed the data for a consecutive series of 88 patients (mean age 27.1 years (15 to 49); 65 male (74%) and 23 female (26%)) who underwent single-stage repair of a displaced BH meniscal tear (67 medial (76%) and 21 lateral (24%)) with concomitant hamstring autograft ACLR. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), and Tegner score were recorded at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate meniscal repair survivorship. Analyses were performed with different cut-offs for meniscal and ACL injury-to-surgery time (within three weeks, three to ten weeks, and more than ten weeks). Results: Meniscal repair survivorship at a median final follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range (IQR) 24 to 91) was 82% (95% confidence interval 70 to 89). A total of 13 meniscus repairs failed (12 requiring meniscectomy and one requiring a further meniscal repair). At final follow-up, median PROMs were: EQ-VAS 85 (IQR 75 to 90), EQ-5D Index 0.84 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), KOOS Pain 89 (IQR 80 to 94), KOOS Symptoms 82 (IQR 71 to 93), KOOS Activities of Daily Living 97 (IQR 91 to 100), KOOS Sport and Recreation 80 (IQR 65 to 90), KOOS Quality of Life 69 (IQR 53 to 86), IKDC 82.8 (IQR 67.8 to 90.8), and Tegner 6 (IQR 4 to 7). Two patients underwent revision ACLR following further injuries. One patient had an arthroscopic washout for infection at 11 days post-BH meniscal repair/ACLR. Four patients (4.5%) required a further procedure for stiffness, reduced ROM, and pain, and all were operated on within three weeks of meniscal injury. There was no difference in the interval between meniscal injury and surgery between repairs that failed and those that survived. Conclusion: These data suggest that concomitant ACLR with repair of displaced BH meniscal tears, even if they have been displaced for some time, appears to afford satisfactory PROMs and good survivorship. Repairs within three weeks of meniscal injury may be associated with higher rates of postoperative reintervention for stiffness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):680-686.
Modeling of human uveal melanoma in zebrafish xenograft embryos.

Wietske van der Ent,C. Burrello,A. Teunisse,B. Ksander,P. A. van der Velden,Martine J Jager,A. Jochemsen,B. Snaar-Jagalska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15202

2014-09-23

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Abstract:PURPOSE Uveal melanoma (UM) is fatal in up to 50% of patients because of liver metastases that are refractory to therapies currently available. While murine xenograft models for human uveal melanoma are available, they have limited utility for screening large compound libraries in drug discovery studies. Therefore, new robust preclinical models are needed that can efficiently evaluate drug efficacy for treatment of this malignancy. METHODS Uveal melanoma cell lines generated from primary tumors (92.1, Mel270) and metastases (OMM2.3, OMM2.5, OMM1) were injected into the yolk of 2-day-old zebrafish embryos. After 6 days, proliferation and active migration was quantified via automated confocal image analysis. To determine the suitability of this xenotransplantation model for drug testing, drugs with three different activities (dasatinib, quisinostat, and MLN-4924) were added to the water of uveal melanoma-engrafted embryos. RESULTS All tested UM cell lines proliferated and migrated in the embryos; significant differences could be discerned between cell lines: Cells derived from metastases showed more migration and proliferation than cells derived from the primary tumors, and provided preclinical models for drug testing. Addition of the Src-inhibitor dasatinib in the water of engrafted embryos reduced proliferation and migration of high Src-expressing 92.1 cells, but did not affect low Src-expressing metastatic OMM2.3 cells. Two experimental anticancer drugs, quisinostat (a histone deacetylase inhibitor) and MLN-4924 (neddylation pathway inhibitor), blocked migration and proliferation of 92.1 and OMM2.3. CONCLUSIONS We established a zebrafish xenograft model of human uveal melanoma with demonstrated applicability for screening large libraries of compounds in drug discovery studies.
[Study on clinical characteristics and surgical methods of bucket-handle meniscal tears]

Xingyue Niu,Qian Zhao,Huifeng Zheng,Xiao Chen,Dong Zhao,Jiang Wu,Fuji Ren,Jingmin Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202308001

2023-11-15

Abstract:Objective: To summarize the clinical features, surgical methods, and prognosis of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMTs), and provide guidance for clinical treatment. Methods: The clinical data of 91 BHMTs patients (91 knees), who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2015 and January 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 68 males and 23 females. Age ranged from 16 to 58 years with an average of 34.4 years. The injury was caused by sports in 68 cases, traffic accident in 15 cases, and falls or sprains in 8 cases. There were 49 cases of left knee injury and 42 cases of right knee injury. The time from the onset of symptoms to the admission ranged from 1 day to 13 months (median, 18 days), including >1 month in 35 cases and ≤1 month in 56 cases. Medial BHMTs occurred in 52 cases and lateral BHMTs in 39 cases. There were 36 cases with ACL rupture and 12 cases with discoid meniscus. The knee extension was limited more than 10° in 55 cases. According to the condition of meniscus injury, the meniscus suture with Inside-out combined with All-inside techniques (54 cases) or meniscoplasty (37 cases) under arthroscopy were selected. ACL reconstruction was performed in all patients with ACL rupture with autogenous hamstring tendon. Postoperative complications were observed. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score were used to evaluate knee function, and clinical failure was recorded. Results: Two patients developed intermuscular venous thrombosis, which improved after oral anticoagulant therapy. No vascular injury, postoperative infection, joint stiffness, or other complications occurred in all patients. All patients were followed up 24-95 months, with a median of 64 months. A total of 12 cases (13.19%) failed the operation and were re-operated or given oral anti-inflammatory analgesics and rehabilitation therapy. At last follow-up, IKDC score and Lysholm score of 91 patients significantly increased when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05), while Tegner score significantly decreased ( P<0.05). The above indexes of patients treated with meniscus suture and meniscoplasty were also significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05). Conclusion: BHMTs occurs mostly in young men and is one of the important reasons for the limitation of knee extension after trauma. Arthroscopic meniscus suture and meniscoplasty can obtain good effectiveness according to individual conditions of patients. But the latter can better preserve the shape and function of meniscus, and theoretically can obtain better long-term outcomes, which needs to be confirmed by further research with larger sample size.
Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Chondral Lesions after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Xi Gong,Dong Jiang,Yong-Jian Wang,Jian Wang,Ying-Fang Ao,Jia-Kuo Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513496064

IF: 4.8

2013-01-01

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Background: Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been reported to yield better joint stability than single-bundle (SB) reconstruction. Few studies have compared the 2 techniques with regard to postoperative articular cartilage changes. Hypothesis: Less cartilage damage should occur in the short term after DB ACLR than after SB ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The study included 52 patients (27 in the DB group and 25 in the SB group) with no chondral or meniscus injury at primary ACLR, as confirmed under arthroscopy. Four-strand and 6- to 8-strand hamstring autografts, respectively, were used for transtibial SB and 4-tunnel DB reconstruction. Each graft was fixed with an EndoButton bioabsorbable interference screw and a staple. Cartilage status at 6 identified regions was evaluated by second-look arthroscopy and the Outerbridge classification. Other assessments at final follow-up included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner and Lysholm scores, side-to-side difference on KT-2000 arthrometer, and range of motion. Results: The mean time from reconstruction to second-look arthroscopy was 18.2 and 17.3 months for the DB and SB groups, respectively. Both groups had cartilage lesions at the patellofemoral joint (patella, 9 vs 13; trochlea, 5 vs 12) and the medial compartment (1 vs 2). Significantly less severe lesions were found in the DB group than in the SB group (mean grade, 0.33 vs 0.96; P < .05). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of cartilage status at other regions, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, KT-2000 arthrometer anterior laxity, or range of motion. Conclusion: Chondral lesions were found postoperatively in both DB and SB ACLR groups with hamstring autograft. The DB ALCR led to less cartilage damage at the femoral trochlea at short-term follow-up.
All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review

Lika Dzidzishvili,Rodrigo Saad Berreta,Garrett R Jackson,Colton C Mowers,Eric J Cotter,Sachin Allahabadi,Jorge Chahla,Garrett R. Jackson,Colton C. Mowers,Eric J. Cotter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.021

2024-02-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, failure rates, risk factors for failure, and complications in patients with bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMTs) undergoing repair with inside-out (IO) versus all-inside (AI) techniques.METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception to August 2023 according to the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of Level I to IV clinical studies published in the past 10 years with greater than 2 years of follow-up that evaluated patient-reported outcome scores and/or the incidence of failure after IO or AI repairs for BHMTs. Clinical studies not reporting outcomes or failure rates, older studies using outdated implants, animal studies, reviews, letters to the editor, case reports, cadaveric studies, and articles not written in the English language or with English-language translation were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Outcomes were reported as ranges and qualitatively compared.RESULTS: A total of 16 studies published from 2013 to 2023, consisting of 1,062 patients with BHMTs, were identified. Thirteen studies (14 cohorts, 649 patients) reported on AI repair (mean age range, 23.7-32 years) and 7 studies (7 cohorts, 413 patients) reported on IO repair (mean age range, 16.7-34.6 years). Both groups had improved postoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. Decreased range of motion was the most commonly reported complication in the AI group (range, 2.6%-4%), whereas adhesions for arthrofibrosis were the most commonly reported complication in the IO group (n = 12; range, 6%-7.9%). The overall reported failure rate ranged from 6.9% to 20.5% within the AI group and from 0% to 20% within the IO group.CONCLUSIONS: AI and IO repair techniques for BHMTs both result in improved Lysholm and Tegner scores. However, broad ranges of failure are reported in the literature, with overall failure rates ranging from 6.9% to 20.5% after AI repair and from 0% to 20% after IO repair. Younger age and isolated medial BHMT repair are the most frequently reported risk factors for the AI technique, whereas postoperative stiffness is the most frequently reported complication after both repair techniques.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
[Clinical observation of arthroscopic all-inside combined with outside-in "suture loop" repair for meniscus bucket-handle tear]

Maimaitikelimu Tusongjiang,Yong Jia,Gang Xu,Chunqing He,Fei Zhang,Jian Liu,Pengbo Wang,Wumuerbieke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202003132

2020-10-15

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic all-inside combined with outside-in "suture loop" repair for meniscus bucket-handle tear (BHT). Methods: Between August 2016 and May 2019, 44 case of meniscus BHT were treated with arthroscopic all-inside combined outside-in "suture loop". There were 29 males and 15 females with an average age of 26.6 years (range, 18-42 years). The causes of injury included sports injury in 31 cases, falling injury in 7 cases, and sprain in 6 cases. There were 32 cases of medial meniscus posterior horn tears and 12 cases of lateral meniscus posterior horn tears. The disease duration ranged from 6 weeks to 3 months. Thirty-three cases were complicated with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. All patients had normal lower limb alignment. The preoperative Lysholm score was 42.1±9.1. According to the evaluation criteria of MRI and Barrett et al., the healing of meniscus was evaluated, and the effectiveness was evaluated by Lysholm score. Results: All the 44 patients were followed up 8-36 months with an average of 16.8 months. At last follow-up, according to the evaluation criteria of Barrett et al., 39 cases were clinically healed, 5 cases were not healed, the clinical healing rate was 88.6%; according to MRI evaluation, 32 cases were completely healed, 7 cases were partially healed, and 5 cases were not healed, the total healing rate was 88.6%, and the complete healing rate was 72.7%. Lysholm score was 87.8±4.8, which was significantly different from that before operation ( t=31.060, P=0.000). Conclusion: Arthroscopic all-inside combined with outside-in "suture loop" repair is a reliable and effective method for the meniscus BHT, which can obtain good joint function.
Extra primary seeding of glioblastoma multiforme in the subarachnoid space and ependyma

M. Moore,George Eisinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.13.10.855

IF: 9.9

1963-10-01

Neurology

Abstract:ALTHOUGH it has been stated that “the most malignant form of glioma (glioblastoma multiforme) is the rarest to invade and grow within the subarachnoid space,”l an increasing number of such cases are being recorded. The reasons for the alleged rarity of both intracranial meningeal spread a n d extracranial metastasis of glioblastoma multiforme need reappraisal a t this time in the light of new understanding of the factors influencing cytopathogenesis.
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Isabella T. Wu,Mario Hevesi,Vishal S. Desai,Christopher L. Camp,Diane L. Dahm,Bruce A. Levy,Michael J. Stuart,Aaron J. Krych

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518786035

IF: 4.8

2018-08-02

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Background: Full-thickness radial meniscal tears render the meniscus nonfunctional and have historically been treated with partial meniscectomy. As preservative techniques evolve for radial repair, comparisons with other tear patterns are necessary to evaluate repair efficacy and prognosis. Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of radial meniscal repair and to compare them to bucket-handle meniscal repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Radial and bucket-handle meniscal tears without concurrent root injuries undergoing surgical repair at a single institution between 2007 and 2015 were analyzed, including both all-inside and inside-out suturing techniques. Propensity matching was performed on the basis of age at surgery, sex, meniscus laterality, body mass index (BMI), and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a comparison pool of 70 bucket-handle repairs. Reoperation-free survival rates and Tegner, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were analyzed. Results: Twenty-four patients (18 male, 6 female; mean age, 22.8 ± 11.9 years) who underwent repair of a radial meniscal tear were followed for a mean of 3.5 years (range, 2.0-6.3 years). Significant postoperative improvements in VAS scores at rest and with use and IKDC scores were noted postoperatively ( P < .001). Five patients (20.8%) required a reoperation. Subsequently, 18 patients with radial tears (mean age, 19.1 ± 9.1 years; 12 male; mean BMI, 27.0 ± 6.2 kg/m 2 ; 3 medial; 11 ACLR) were propensity matched to 18 patients with bucket-handle tears (mean age, 20.8 ± 5.1 years; 13 male; mean BMI, 25.0 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 ; 3 medial; 11 ACLR). The matched radial and bucket-handle groups demonstrated similar ( P = .17) reoperation-free survival rates at 2 years (88.9% and 94.4%, respectively) and 5 years (77.8% and 87.7%, respectively). VAS and IKDC scores improved significantly after surgery ( P < .001), with no difference noted between the groups ( P ≥ .17). Patients with radial and bucket-handle meniscal repairs achieved mean postoperative Tegner scores (6.6 and 6.6, respectively) not significantly different from their preinjury levels (6.9 and 6.7, respectively) ( P ≥ .32). Conclusion: Satisfactory clinical outcomes are achievable for radial meniscal tear repair at short-term follow-up. In a robustly matched comparison, radial and bucket-handle meniscal tears demonstrate similar improvements in VAS and IKDC scores, restoration of preoperative Tegner scores, and acceptable reoperation rates. Full-thickness radial meniscal tears should be considered for repair.
Arthroscopic Observation on the Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autogenous Patella-Tendon and Autogenous Hamstring-Tendon on the Articular Cartilage of Patellofemoral Joint

Gong Xi,Ao Yingfang,Yu Changlong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2007.03.003

2007-01-01

Abstract:Purpose To investigate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on articular cartilage of patellofemoral joint through second-look arthroscopy and to investigate the difference between autogenous patella-tendon reconstruction and autogenous hamstring-tendon reconstruction.Methods Six hundred and thirty one cases with ACL rupture underwent reconstructive ACL surgery assisted with arthroscopy from December 2000 to December 2004, and they had second-look arthroscopy because of taking away the hardware, in which 103 cases were reconstructed with patella tendon (patella tendon group), 528 cases were reconstructed with hamstring tendon (hamstring tendon group). Results Fifty nine (59) sites of cartilage lesions in patellofemoral joint were found by arthroscopy in patella tendon group during surgery. 56 new cartilage lesions were found at second-look arthroscopy after ACL reconstruction (including 28 at patella and 28 at trochlea). Average 0.54 site of cartilage lesions per patient increased. Most added cartilage lesions were 2 degree. 265 sites of cartilage lesions in patellofemoral joint were found by arthroscopy in 528 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autogenous hamstring tendon. 263 cartilage lesions were added at second-look arthroscopy after ACL reconstruction, 107 lesions were located at patella and 156 were at trochlea. Average 0.50 site cartilage lesions per patient increased. Most added cartilage lesions were categorized as II degree. There was not significant different in the aggravation of cartilage lesion between the two groups at second-look arthroscopy (P>0.05).Conclusion Cartilage lesions of patellofemoral joint was increased to a certain extent at second-look arthroscopy after ACL reconstruction. Most added cartilage lesions were categorized as II degree. No more cartilage lesions of patella-femoral joint were found in patients reconstructed either with autogenous patella-tendon or with autogenous hamstring-tendon.
OUTCOME OF TREATMENT FOLLOWING PRIMARY ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF BUCKET HANDLE MENISCUS TEARS IN ADULTS

R. Nanjundaiah,R. Guro,A. Chandratreya,R. Kotwal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.3.008

2024-01-23

Abstract:Aims We studied the outcomes following arthroscopic primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears to determine the incidence of re-tears and the functional outcomes of these patients. Methodology Prospective cohort study. Over a 4-year period (2016 to 2020), 35 adult patients presented with a bucket handle tear of the meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using either the all inside technique or a combination of all-inside and inside-out techniques. 15 patients also underwent simultaneous arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Functional knee scores were assessed using IKDC and Lysholm scores. Results Mean patient age at surgery was 27 years (range, 17 to 53years). Medial meniscus was torn in 20 and lateral in 15 cases. Zone of tear was white on white in 19, red on white in 9 and red on red in 7 cases. Average delay from injury to surgery was 4 months. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, the meniscus repair failed in 3 patients (8.5 %). Outcome following re-tear was meniscus excision. Average IKDC scores in patients with intact repair were 74.04 against 56.67 in patients with a failed repair (p< 0.0001). Similarly, Lyshlom scores were 88.96 and 67.333, respectively (p<0.0001). Conclusion The survivorship of primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears in our series was 91.5% at medium term follow-up. Functional outcomes were significantly poor in patients with a failed repair compared to those with an intact repair.
Second-look Arthroscopic Evaluation of the Articular Cartilage after Primary Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

Wang Hai-jun,Ao Ying-fang,Chen Lian-xu,Gong Xi,Wang Yong-jian,Ma Yong,Leung Kevin Kar Ming,Yu Jia-kuo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.21.021

2011-01-01

Abstract:Background Several reports have shown the progression of articular cartilage degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. No report has been published about the cartilage comparing changes after single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the articular cartilage changes after SB and DB ACL reconstructions by second-look arthroscopy.Methods Ninety-nine patients who received arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed at an average of 14 months after reconstruction, 58 patients underwent SB ACL reconstruction and 41 patients underwent DB ACL reconstruction. Hamstring tendon autografts were used in all patients. Second-look arthroscopy was done in conjunction with the tibial staple fixation removal at least one year after the initial ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic evaluation and grading of the articular cartilage degeneration for all patients were performed at the initial ACL reconstruction, and at the second-look arthroscopy.Results The average cartilage degeneration at the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) was found significantly worsened after both SB and DB ACL reconstructions. This worsening were not seen at medial tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and lateral TFJ. Grade II cartilage damage was the most common. At second-look arthroscopy, the average patellar cartilage degeneration was 1.14 +/- 0.14 (at first look 0.52 +/- 0.11) for the SB group, and 1.22 +/- 0.15 (at first look 0.56 +/- 0.12) for the DB group. The average trochlear cartilage degeneration was 1.05 +/- 0.16 (at fist look 0.10 +/- 0.06) and 0.66 +/- 0.17 (at fist look 0.17 +/- 0.09), respectively. The average patellar cartilage degeneration showed no significant difference in both groups. However, the average trochlea cartilage degeneration in DB group was significantly less than in SB group.Conclusions Patellofemoral cartilage degeneration continued to aggravate after ACL reconstruction. DB ACL reconstruction could significantly decrease the trochlea cartilage degeneration compared with SB ACL reconstruction. Chin Med J 2011;124(21):3551-3555
Comparison of Subsequent Surgery After Repair in Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears and Meniscectomy Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study

David Y Ding,Lue-Yen Tucker,Amy L Vieira,Michael W Heffner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241270355

2024-09-05

Abstract:Background: Bucket-handle meniscal tears are large longitudinal vertical meniscal tears that have an attached fragment flipped into the intercondylar notch. Meniscal repair attempts to restore the function of the meniscus and aims to preserve joint mechanics. Alternatively, meniscectomy results in quicker recovery but may lead to future degeneration. Purposes: To evaluate the long-term risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery in patients who underwent a bucket-handle meniscal repair (BHMR) versus meniscectomy/bucket-handle meniscal debridement (BHMD) and assess risk factors associated with subsequent knee surgical intervention. Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An electronic health records search for all patients who underwent arthroscopic knee meniscal surgery (repair and meniscectomy) between 2011 and 2018 was performed. Natural language processing was used to search for terms of interest in the long operative notes to determine whether these surgeries were performed for bucket-handle meniscal tears. These patients comprised our initial cohort. Study patients were followed for at least 1 year and for up to 5 years (until December 31, 2019), with censoring at death or membership disenrollment. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes were evaluated via a database review. The primary outcome was subsequent ipsilateral knee surgeries and secondary outcomes included contralateral knee surgeries, deep surgical site infections, and venous thrombotic events. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to model for subsequent surgical treatment of the ipsilateral knee. A subset analysis for patients aged 30 to 50 years was then performed. Results: The median follow-up time was 52.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 33.5-60 months). A total of 1359 patients underwent BHMR and 1537 patients underwent BHMD. The median age was 24 years (IQR, 17-34 years) for the BHMR versus 38 years (IQR, 27-47 years) for the BHMD group (P < .001). Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the BHMR group compared with the BHMD group (P < .001). BHMR was significantly more likely to be performed during a concomitant ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) than a BHMD (44.2% vs 30.1%, P < .001). During the follow-up period, a total of 656 subsequent ipsilateral procedures were performed in 393 (13.6%) patients. Patients who underwent initial BHMR were at a significantly higher risk of undergoing subsequent meniscal repair (4.3% vs 1%, P < .001), meniscectomy (12.1% vs 3.3%, P < .001), and ACLR (7.4% vs 2.9%, P < .001) compared with those who underwent BHMD. Multivariable analysis showed that BHMR, younger age, and lower BMI were risk factors for subsequent ipsilateral surgery. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, subset analysis showed that for patients aged 30 to 50 years, undergoing a BHMR versus a BHMD led to a 2.3-fold higher risk of subsequent surgery, a 5.3-fold higher risk of subsequent meniscal repair and a 3.2-fold higher risk of subsequent meniscectomy. Conclusion: BHMR was more often performed in younger patients with a lower BMI, especially during a concomitant ACLR. Patients treated with BHMR were more likely to undergo subsequent surgeries, with the likelihood decreasing with increasing age. Subset analyses showed increasing risk for subsequent surgeries with BHMR versus BHMD in the cohort consisting of patients aged 30 to 50 years.
Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes

P. Gupta,Alan W. Reynolds,Charles A. Popkin,B. Saltzman,Apoorva Mehta,Caroline E. Taber,David P. Trofa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967123s00224

IF: 2.6

2023-07-01

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Objectives: Bucket handle meniscal tears are a challenging clinical entity with a failure rate as high as 34.5%, which is in stark contrast from the estimated 5% for more simple tear patterns. There are limited data on patient or surgical factors that affect failure. The purpose of this study is to characterize patient and surgical variables that impact two main outcomes: return to sport and revision surgery following surgical repair for bucket handle meniscus tears. Methods: A retrospective review of all meniscus repairs from 1/1/11 to 1/1/21 was performed for a single institution, and all bucket handle meniscus repairs were included in the study. Demographic information was collected along with injury characteristics and surgical techniques. Outcomes included return to sport and need for revision surgery. Patients with more than 50% of data missing for the variables of interest were removed from the study. Patients without follow-up notes were excluded from return to sport analysis. Failure rate was defined by either a documented re-tear of the former bucket handle meniscus or a revision surgery. Results: There were 205 patients included in the final analysis, with an average of age of 24.42 and 76.39% male, with an average follow-up time of 12.52 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Operative characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Of the 117 patients that played sports with available follow-up data, 90 (76.9%) returned to sport and 27 did not (23.1%) with an average follow-up time of 15.01 months. Average return to sport time was 7.21 months +/- 3.77 months. Twelve (13.8%) patients that returned to sport and 12 (44.4%) of the patients who did not underwent future meniscectomy or revision repair surgery. Overall failure rate was 19.0%. The rate of failure of combined all-inside and outside-in technique (33.33%) was higher than rate of failure in all-inside technique alone (14.17%). In a bivariate analysis of risk factors for failure, the variables for age, sex, smoking, BMI, ASA classification, mechanism of injury, and symptom duration before surgery were not found to be statistically significantly different between patients who failed and did not fail repair. Conclusions: The overall return to sport rate after bucket handle meniscus tear repair in this study was found to be 76.9 with an average return to sport time of 7.21 months. The overall failure rate was found to be 19.0% with an average follow-up time of 12.52 months. Further studies are needed to better understand outcomes following bucket handle meniscus repairs.

Medicine

Preoperative Assessment of Craniopharyngioma Adherence: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings Correlated with the Severity of Tumor Attachment to the Hypothalamus.

Arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of medial meniscus lesion in anterior cruciate ligament--deficient knees: results of second-look arthroscopies in 39 cases

Good mid- to long-term outcomes after meniscus bucket-handle tear repair: A comparative analysis with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes of meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of suture and meniscus fixation device

Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction

Ureaplasma urealyticum destructive septic arthritis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus after rituximab therapy.

Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Healing Rates After Arthroscopic Repair of Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Meniscus Repair with Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes, Failure Rates and Subsequent Processing.

Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study

Modeling of human uveal melanoma in zebrafish xenograft embryos.

[Study on clinical characteristics and surgical methods of bucket-handle meniscal tears]

Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Chondral Lesions after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review

[Clinical observation of arthroscopic all-inside combined with outside-in "suture loop" repair for meniscus bucket-handle tear]

Extra primary seeding of glioblastoma multiforme in the subarachnoid space and ependyma

Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Arthroscopic Observation on the Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autogenous Patella-Tendon and Autogenous Hamstring-Tendon on the Articular Cartilage of Patellofemoral Joint

OUTCOME OF TREATMENT FOLLOWING PRIMARY ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF BUCKET HANDLE MENISCUS TEARS IN ADULTS

Second-look Arthroscopic Evaluation of the Articular Cartilage after Primary Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

Comparison of Subsequent Surgery After Repair in Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears and Meniscectomy Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study

Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes