Abstract:Verification-aware programming languages such as Dafny and F* provide means to formally specify and prove properties of a program. Although the problem of checking an implementation against a specification can be defined mechanically, there is no algorithmic way of ensuring the correctness of the {\it user-intent formalization for programs}, expressed as a formal specification. This is because intent or requirement is expressed {\it informally} in natural language and the specification is a formal artefact. Despite, the advent of large language models (LLMs) has made tremendous strides bridging the gap between informal intent and formal program implementations recently, driven in large parts by benchmarks and automated metrics for evaluation. Recent work has proposed a framework for evaluating the {\it user-intent formalization} problem for mainstream programming languages~\cite{endres-fse24}. However, such an approach does not readily extend to verification-aware languages that support rich specifications (using quantifiers and ghost variables) that cannot be evaluated through dynamic execution. Previous work also required generating program mutants using LLMs to create the benchmark. We advocate an alternate, perhaps simpler approach of {\it symbolically testing specifications} to provide an intuitive metric for evaluating the quality of specifications for verification-aware languages. We demonstrate that our automated metric agrees closely on a human-labeled dataset of Dafny specifications for the popular MBPP code-generation benchmark, yet demonstrates cases where the human labeling is not perfect. We also outline formal verification challenges that need to be addressed to apply the technique more widely. We believe our work provides a stepping stone to enable the establishment of a benchmark and research agenda for the problem of user-intent formalization for programs.

Towards Deriving Verification Properties

Deductive Software Verification: From Pen-and-Paper Proofs to Industrial Tools

Formal Verification of Control Systems Properties with Theorem Proving

Formal verification of user-level real-time property patterns

Automating Verification of Event-B Models

Towards Automatic Property Generation for SoC Security Verification

Lessons from Formally Verified Deployed Software Systems (Extended version)

Constructing property-oriented models for verification

A spiral process of formalization and verification

Machine-Checked Proofs For Realizability Checking Algorithms

Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis

Towards Realizability Checking of Contracts using Theories

Verification of Program by Inspecting Internal Relations Relying on User Requirements

Automatic verification of Finite Variant Property beyond convergent equational theories

How Deduction Systems Can Help You To Verify Stability Properties

A Formal Verification Methodology for Checking Data Integrity

Verification Problems in Conceptual Workflow Specifications

A Novel Approach to Verifying Context Free Properties of Programs.

Verification Method for Concurrent Programs Properties Based on Separation Logic

Automated Software Verification of Hyperliveness

Evaluating LLM-driven User-Intent Formalization for Verification-Aware Languages