Challenges for an Ontology of Artificial Intelligence

Scott H. Hawley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.03171
2019-02-26
Abstract:Of primary importance in formulating a response to the increasing prevalence and power of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in society are questions of ontology. Questions such as: What "are" these systems? How are they to be regarded? How does an algorithm come to be regarded as an agent? We discuss three factors which hinder discussion and obscure attempts to form a clear ontology of AI: (1) the various and evolving definitions of AI, (2) the tendency for pre-existing technologies to be assimilated and regarded as "normal," and (3) the tendency of human beings to anthropomorphize. This list is not intended as exhaustive, nor is it seen to preclude entirely a clear ontology, however, these challenges are a necessary set of topics for consideration. Each of these factors is seen to present a 'moving target' for discussion, which poses a challenge for both technical specialists and non-practitioners of AI systems development (e.g., philosophers and theologians) to speak meaningfully given that the corpus of AI structures and capabilities evolves at a rapid pace. Finally, we present avenues for moving forward, including opportunities for collaborative synthesis for scholars in philosophy and science.
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the ontological problem regarding artificial intelligence (AI), that is, how to define and understand these systems. Specifically, the paper explores the following three main challenges: 1. **Changes in the Definition of AI**: The definition of AI has changed over time, and different researchers and fields have different understandings and definitions of AI. This has led to a great deal of ambiguity and uncertainty when discussing AI. 2. **"Normalization" of Technology**: With the development of technology, many technologies that were originally considered AI have gradually been accepted by society and regarded as "normal" technologies and are no longer considered AI. This phenomenon has blurred the boundaries of AI and affected the understanding of its essence. 3. **Human Anthropomorphic Tendency**: Humans tend to endow non - human entities (such as machines) with human characteristics or intentions. This anthropomorphic tendency further confounds the correct understanding and evaluation of AI systems. By exploring these issues, the paper aims to provide a basis for establishing a clear artificial intelligence ontology, thereby better understanding the essence of AI and its impact on society.