Michael A Meyer,Gerhard Kminek,David W Beaty,Brandi L Carrier,Timothy Haltigin,Lindsay E Hays,Carl B Agree,Henner Busemann,Barbara Cavalazzi,Charles S Cockell,Vinciane Debaille,Daniel P Glavin,Monica M Grady,Ernst Hauber,Aurore Hutzler,Bernard Marty,Francis M McCubbin,Lisa M Pratt,Aaron B Regberg,Alvin L Smith,Caroline L Smith,Roger E Summons,Timothy D Swindle,Kimberly T Tait,Nicholas J Tosca,Arya Udry,Tomohiro Usui,Michael A Velbel,Meenakshi Wadhwa,Frances Westall,Maria-Paz Zorzano

Abstract:The Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign must meet a series of scientific and technical achievements to be successful. While the respective engineering responsibilities to retrieve the samples have been formalized through a Memorandum of Understanding between ESA and NASA, the roles and responsibilities of the scientific elements have yet to be fully defined. In April 2020, ESA and NASA jointly chartered the MSR Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2) to build upon previous planning efforts in defining 1) an end-to-end MSR Science Program and 2) needed functionalities and design requirements for an MSR Sample Receiving Facility (SRF). The challenges for the first samples brought from another planet include not only maintaining and providing samples in pristine condition for study, but also maintaining biological containment until the samples meet sample safety criteria for distribution outside of biocontainment. The MSPG2 produced six reports outlining 66 findings. Abbreviated versions of the five additional high-level MSPG2 summary findings are: Summary-1. A long-term NASA/ESA MSR Science Program, along with the necessary funding and human resources, will be required to accomplish the end-to-end scientific objectives of MSR. Summary-2. MSR curation would need to be done concurrently with Biosafety Level-4 containment. This would lead to complex first-of-a-kind curation implementations and require further technology development. Summary-3. Most aspects of MSR sample science could, and should, be performed on samples deemed safe in laboratories outside of the SRF. However, other aspects of MSR sample science are both time-sensitive and sterilization-sensitive and would need to be carried out in the SRF. Summary-4. To meet the unique science, curation, and planetary protection needs of MSR, substantial analytical and sample management capabilities would be required in an SRF. Summary-5. Because of the long lead-time for SRF design, construction, and certification, it is important that preparations begin immediately, even if there is delay in the return of samples.

Mars Missions Failure Report Assortment: Review and Conspectus

A Study on Mars Probe Failures

Assessment of Efficiency, Impact Factor, Impact of Probe Mass, Probe Life Expectancy, and Reliability of Mars Missions

Interplanetary Challenges Encountered by the Crew During their Interplanetary Transit from Earth to Mars

Design of a Martian Autonomous Rotary-Wing Vehicle

Conceptual Design of Mars Sample Return Mission Using Solar Montgolfieres

Orbital and Planetary Challenges for Human Mars Exploration

"Mars" Character of the Composition Analysis

Mars: new insights and unresolved questions

NASA's new Mars Exploration Program: the trajectory of knowledge

The Mars Sample Return Project

About feasibility of SpaceX's human exploration Mars mission scenario with Starship

Conceptual Design of Mars Lander with Novel Impact Intriguing System

Interpreted Investigation Report: Loss of Vikram Lander During Lunar Landing Phase

Planetary Protection Implementation and Verification Approach for the Mars 2020 Mission

Postflight Assessment of Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Simulation

Final Report of the Mars Sample Return Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2)

Mars 2020 Mission Overview

Error analysis and mid-course maneuver of earth-mars transfer orbit

Mission Architecture Using the SpaceX Starship Vehicle to Enable a Sustained Human Presence on Mars

Communications for the Planet Mars: Past, Present, and Future