Robert G. Donnelly,Alexander F. Thome
Abstract:For a given family of similar shapes, what we call a "unit shape" strongly analogizes the role of the unit circle within the family of all circles. Within many such families of similar shapes, we present what we believe is naturally and intrinsically unital about their unit shapes. We present a number of calculus problems related to extremal questions about collections of unit shapes, and we recapitulate some isoperimetric problems in terms of unit shapes. We close by presenting some problems (some of which are open) and by proffering perhaps a new perspective on the $\pi$ vs. $\tau$ debate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly revolve around how to define and understand the "unit shape" in a given family of similar shapes. Specifically:
1. **Defining the unit shape**: The author proposes a method to define the unit shape in any given family of similar shapes. These unit shapes are similar to the role of the unit circle in the family of circles. The definition of the unit shape is based on the relationship between area and semi - perimeter, that is, \(A(U)=S(U)\), where \(A(U)\) is the area of shape \(U\) and \(S(U)\) is its semi - perimeter.
2. **Exploring the properties of the unit shape**: The author shows the properties of the unit shape through a series of specific examples (such as the unit right triangle, the unit general triangle, the unit rectangle, the unit rhombus, the unit parallelogram and the unit ellipse) and discusses the uniqueness of these unit shapes.
3. **Solving extreme value problems**: The author considers some extreme value problems related to the unit shape, for example: which unit triangle encloses the smallest area? These problems can usually be transformed into isoperimetric problems.
4. **Re - examining the debate between \(\pi\) and \(\tau\)**: The author proposes the view that the concept of unit shape may contribute to the debate between \(\pi\) and \(\tau\). Specifically, from the perspective of the unit shape, the properties of the circle can be understood more naturally, which may provide a new perspective for this debate.
### Specific problem analysis
- **Definition of unit shape**:
- For a given shape \(C\), its unit shape \(U(C)\) is defined as the shape that satisfies \(A(U(C)) = S(U(C))\).
- The unit shape \(U(C)\) can be obtained by scaling \(C\) with a scaling factor of \(\frac{S(C)}{A(C)}\).
- **Extreme value problems**:
- For example, for unit triangles, the author explores which unit triangles have the smallest area and gives the corresponding minimum area value.
- Through the Isoperimetric Inequality, the author proves that the unit circle is the unit shape with the smallest area, and its area is \(\pi\).
- **The debate between \(\pi\) and \(\tau\)**:
- The author believes that the concept of unit shape can provide a new perspective for the debate between \(\pi\) and \(\tau\), because the definition and properties of the unit shape can explain the geometric characteristics of the circle more naturally.
### Conclusion
By introducing the concept of unit shape, this paper not only provides a new tool for understanding the properties of various shapes, but also provides a new method for solving some classical mathematical problems (such as isoperimetric problems). At the same time, this concept also provides a new thinking angle for the debate on the mathematical constants \(\pi\) and \(\tau\).