THE EFFECT OF HIPPOCAMPAL SPARING ON VERBAL MEMORY OUTCOME FOLLOWING DOMINANT TEMPORAL LOBECTOMY

G. Risse,D. Ph,A. Hempel,G. Moriarty,D. M.,J. Gates
Abstract:REVISED ABSTRACT RATIONALE: In recent years, risk of material specific verbal memory decline following dominant temporal lobectomy (TL) has led to selective cases of surgical sparing of the hippocampus in our program. This study examines the memory outcome of these patients. METHODS: The subjects were 38 dominant TL patients. Twenty-six underwent TL with resection of the hippocampus, while the hippocampus was spared in 12 cases based on a combination of risk factors including absence of MTS, intact dominant hemisphere memory performance in the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP), later age of seizure onset and intact baseline verbal memory test performance. The two groups were compared on measures of the verbal Selective Reminding Test (vSRT) using pre-to postoperative difference scores with a univariate ANOVA which adjusted for baseline performance on each variable. The two groups did not differ in age, IQ or gender. RESULTS: Preoperative performance on the vSRT was equivalent for the two groups with mean scores ranging from intact to mildly impaired. Postoperatively, patients who underwent hippocampal resection demonstrated significantly greater decline in consistent long term retrieval (p<.05) and delayed recall (p<.05) vSRT measures, compared to patients whose surgeries spared the hippocampus. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that sparing of the hippocampus in dominant TL results in preservation of verbal memory. This more conservative surgical procedure in cases at high risk for postoperative memory decline is neuropsychologically justified. These data will be discussed in relation to surgical selection criteria and postoperative seizure outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?