Abstract:Host–parasite co‐evolution can have profound impacts on a wide range of ecological and evolutionary processes, including population dynamics, the maintenance of genetic diversity, and the evolution of recombination. To examine the co‐evolution of quantitative traits in hosts and parasites, we present and study a co‐evolutionary model of a social parasite–host system that incorporates (i) ecological dynamics that feed back into their co‐evolutionary outcomes; (ii) variation in whether the social parasite is obligate or facultative; and (iii) Holling Type II functional responses between host and social parasite, which are particularly suitable for social parasites that face time costs for host location and its social manipulation. We perform local and global analyses for the co‐evolutionary model and the corresponding ecological model. In the absence of evolution, our ecological model analyses imply that an extremely small value of the death rate for facultative social parasites can drive a host extinct globally under certain conditions, while an extremely large value of the death rate can drive the parasite extinct globally. The facultative parasite system can have one, two, or three coexistence equilibria, while the obligate parasite system can have either one or three coexistence equilibria. Multiple coexistence equilibria result in rich dynamics with multiple attractors. The ecological system, in particular, can exhibit bi‐stability between the facultative parasite‐only equilibrium and the coexistence equilibrium when it has two coexistence equilibria. Our analysis on the co‐evolutionary model provides important insights on how co‐evolution can change the ecological and evolutionary outcomes of host–parasite interactions. Our findings suggest that: (i) The host and parasite can select different strategies that may result in local extinction of host or parasite. These strategies can have convergence stability (CS), but may not be evolutionary stable strategies (ESS); (ii) The host and its facultative (or obligate) parasite can have ESS that drive the host (or the obligate parasite) extinct locally; (iii) The dependence of vital rates on the phenotypic trait plays an important role in the CS of both exclusion and coexistence equilibria, as well as their ESS; and (iv) A small variance in the trait difference that measures parasitism efficiency can destabilize the co‐evolutionary system, and generate evolutionary arms‐race dynamics with different host–parasite fluctuating patterns.

Technological Parasitism

A New Classification of Technologies

Measurement of the evolution of technology: A new perspective

A Social Model of Technological Evolution

A new concept of technology with systemic-purposeful perpsective: theory, examples and empirical application

Co-evolution of replicators and their parasites

Killer Technologies: the destructive creation in the technical change

How Turing parasites expand the computational landscape of digital life

Product innovation based on the host gene and target gene recombination under the technological parasitism framework

Technological Developments and Factor Substitution in a Complex and Dynamic System

CO‐EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF A SOCIAL PARASITE–HOST INTERACTION MODEL: OBLIGATE VERSUS FACULTATIVE SOCIAL PARASITISM

Metabolic Growth Theory: Market-Share Competition, Learning Uncertainty, and Technology Wavelets

Parasite evolution of host manipulation strategies with fluctuating ecological dynamics

The Evolution of Management Models: A Neo-Schumpeterian Theory

The Evolutionary Game Analysis on Path Dependency in Technology Change

The Effects of Technology and Innovation on Society

Technological innovation and complexity theory

A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems

Co-evolutionary dynamics of a host-parasite interaction model: obligate versus facultative social parasitism

A classical-evolutionary model of technological change

Inside the Host: Understanding the Evolutionary Trajectories of Intracellular Parasitism