Abstract:The challenge of detecting research topics in a specific research field has attracted attention from researchers in the bibliometrics community. In this study, to solve two problems of clustering papers, i.e., the influence of different distributions of citation links and involved textual features on similarity computation, the authors propose a hybrid self-optimized clustering model to detect research topics by extending the hybrid clustering model to identify "core documents". First, the Amsler network, consisting of bibliographic coupling and co-citation links, is created to calculate the citation-based similarity based on the cosine angle of papers. Second, the cosine similarity is also used to compute the text-based similarity, which consists of the textual statistical and topological features. Then, the cosine angle of the linear combination of citation- and text-based similarity is considered as the hybrid similarity. Finally, the Louvain method is applied to cluster papers, and the terms based on term frequency are used to label clusters. To test the performance of the proposed model, a dataset related to the data envelopment analysis field is used for comparison and analysis of clustering results. Based on the benchmark built, different clustering methods with different citation links or textual features are compared according to evaluation measures. The results show that the proposed model can obtain reasonable and effective clustering results, and the research topics of data envelopment analysis field are also analyzed based on the proposed model. As different features are considered in the proposed model compared with previous hybrid clustering models, the proposed clustering model can provide inspiration for further studies on topic identification by other researchers.

A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications

Computing Semantic Relatedness Using Structured Information of Wikipedia

Measuring publication relatedness using controlled vocabularies

Tags Are Related: Measurement of Semantic Relatedness Based on Folksonomy Network

C-Rank: A Link-based Similarity Measure for Scientific Literature Databases

The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Co-Citation Levels

A comparative analysis of local network similarity measurements: application to author citation networks

Hybrid Self-Optimized Clustering Model Based on Citation Links and Textual Features to Detect Research Topics.

Measuring Similarity Based on Link Information: A Comparative Study

Assessment of journal similarity based on citing discipline analysis

Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases

How Related is Author Topical Similarity to Other Author Relatedness Measures?

People Like Us: Mining Scholarly Data for Comparable Researchers

Cited References and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as Two Different Knowledge Representations: Clustering and Mappings at the Paper Level

Seed-based information retrieval in networks of research publications: Evaluation of direct citations, bibliographic coupling, co-citations and PubMed related article score

Recommending Scientific Literature: Comparing Use-Cases and Algorithms

Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents

Comparative Study On Structure And Correlation Among Bibliometrics Co-Occurrence Networks At Author-Level

A New Measurement of Similarity and Related Clustering Algorithm

A Split-Merge Framework for Comparing Clusterings

Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: an exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations