Abstract:The new ways of organising work and offering services on the market through the so-called digital platforms seem to have put the traditional legal standards for classifying employment relationships into question. The mechanism of functioning of digital platforms, in fact, seems to put together a series of ‘old’ problems in a new combination. On the one hand, platforms present themselves on the market as subjects with an apparently rarefied organisational structure, moving along the threads of algorithms; on the other hand, those who collaborate with them seem to do so in a spontaneous, voluntary, random and flexible way. The radical fragmentation, or reduction to the minimum, of the productive organisation, is accompanied by the fragmentation of the work activity itself, made by an anonymous multitude of people (‘crowd’), who move together in the light of invisible dynamics, dictated by unknown algorithms.Academic scholarship - and in some countries also case law - has already offered many and different answers to the problem of the legal classification of the relationship of those who work for/with the platforms. They vary according to the methodological approaches and the systems used as a reference.The present paper argues that it is not possible to provide for a general answer to such question, valid for every concrete case. In fact, the specific features of each relationship between the platform and the workers might largely vary from case to case.However, some elements that are functional to the solution of the classification issue are still disputable and shall be clarified: (a) in most of the cases, the platform does not act as a mere intermediary between the supply and demand for a certain service; instead, it represents the direct supplier of that service, which is provided through the activities of the workers; therefore, the workers are fully integrated into the platforms’ organisation; (b) in the light of the rating mechanism and the adoption of certain contractual clauses on withdrawal – that will be described –, often the worker is made illegitimately liable for the unfulfilment of the obligations to the customer; (c) when the conditions a) and b) occur, a substantial overlap between the business carried out by digital platforms and the workers’ activities can be detected and this shall be taken into consideration in the investigation on the legal status of the workers, especially in order to prevent any attempt to circumvent the application of the employment law protections.

How many people microwork in France? Estimating the size of a new labor force

The gig economy in Poland: evidence based on mobile big data

How Many Online Workers are there in the World? A Data-Driven Assessment

The flow of digital labor

Characterizing the Global Crowd Workforce: A Cross-Country Comparison of Crowdworker Demographics

Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd Work

Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry

Crowd Employment and ICT-Based Mobile Work—New Employment Forms in Europe

The Platform Economy in Europe: Results from the Second ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey (IPWS)

Digitalisation and work: challenges from the platform-economy

A Cross-Country Comparison of Crowdworker Motivations

In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy

Towards decent work in the digital age: introducing the fairwork project in Germany

Making Data: The Work Behind Artificial Intelligence

Women in the gig economy: feminising ‘digital labour’

Income generation on care work digital labour platforms

Controlled by the algorithm, coached by the crowd – how HRM activities take shape on digital work platforms in the gig economy

The Fragmented Labor Power Composition of Gig Workers: Entrepreneurial Tendency and the Heterogeneous Production of Difference

A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers' Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk

Micro-assets and portfolio management in the new platform economy

Why Isn't Uber Worker-Managed? A Model of Digital Platform Cooperatives